Suppr超能文献

根据筛查机构特征分析先进乳腺成像技术的可及性

Advanced Breast Imaging Availability by Screening Facility Characteristics.

作者信息

Lee Christoph I, Bogart Andy, Hubbard Rebecca A, Obadina Eniola T, Hill Deirdre A, Haas Jennifer S, Tosteson Anna N A, Alford-Teaster Jennifer A, Sprague Brian L, DeMartini Wendy B, Lehman Constance D, Onega Tracy L

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 825 Eastlake Ave East, Seattle, WA 98109; Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.

Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2015 Jul;22(7):846-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Apr 4.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship between screening mammography facility characteristics and on-site availability of advanced breast imaging services required for supplemental screening and the diagnostic evaluation of abnormal screening findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from all active imaging facilities across six regional registries of the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium offering screening mammography in calendar years 2011-2012 (n = 105). We used generalized estimating equations regression models to identify associations between facility characteristics (eg, academic affiliation, practice type) and availability of on-site advanced breast imaging (eg, ultrasound [US], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and image-guided biopsy services.

RESULTS

Breast MRI was not available at any nonradiology or breast imaging-only facilities. A combination of breast US, breast MRI, and imaging-guided breast biopsy services was available at 76.0% of multispecialty breast centers compared to 22.2% of full diagnostic radiology practices (P = .0047) and 75.0% of facilities with academic affiliations compared to 29.0% of those without academic affiliations (P = .04). Both supplemental screening breast US and screening breast MRI were available at 28.0% of multispecialty breast centers compared to 4.7% of full diagnostic radiology practices (P < .01) and 25.0% of academic facilities compared to 8.5% of nonacademic facilities (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Screening facility characteristics are strongly associated with the availability of on-site advanced breast imaging and image-guided biopsy service. Therefore, the type of imaging facility a woman attends for screening may have important implications on her timely access to supplemental screening and diagnostic breast imaging services.

摘要

原理与目的

确定乳腺钼靶筛查机构特征与补充筛查及异常筛查结果诊断评估所需的高级乳腺成像服务现场可用性之间的关系。

材料与方法

我们分析了美国国立癌症研究所资助的乳腺癌监测联盟六个区域登记处所有活跃成像机构在2011 - 2012历年提供乳腺钼靶筛查的数据(n = 105)。我们使用广义估计方程回归模型来确定机构特征(如学术隶属关系、执业类型)与现场高级乳腺成像(如超声[US]、磁共振成像[MRI])和图像引导活检服务可用性之间的关联。

结果

任何非放射科或仅乳腺成像的机构均未提供乳腺MRI。多专科乳腺中心有76.0%可同时提供乳腺US、乳腺MRI和成像引导乳腺活检服务,而全诊断放射科执业机构这一比例为22.2%(P = 0.0047);有学术隶属关系的机构中有75.0%可提供这些服务,无学术隶属关系的机构这一比例为29.0%(P = 0.04)。多专科乳腺中心有28.0%可同时提供补充筛查乳腺US和筛查乳腺MRI,全诊断放射科执业机构这一比例为4.7%(P < 0.01);学术机构中有25.0%可提供,非学术机构这一比例为8.5%(P = 0.02)。

结论

筛查机构特征与现场高级乳腺成像和图像引导活检服务的可用性密切相关。因此,女性进行筛查所前往的成像机构类型可能对其及时获得补充筛查和乳腺诊断成像服务具有重要影响。

相似文献

1
Advanced Breast Imaging Availability by Screening Facility Characteristics.
Acad Radiol. 2015 Jul;22(7):846-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
2
Availability of Advanced Breast Imaging at Screening Facilities Serving Vulnerable Populations.
J Med Screen. 2016 Mar;23(1):24-30. doi: 10.1177/0969141315591616. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Underutilization of Supplemental Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Among Patients at High Breast Cancer Risk.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jun;27(6):748-754. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6623. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
4
Associations of County-level Radiologist and Mammography Facility Supply with Screening Mammography Rates in the United States.
Acad Radiol. 2018 Jul;25(7):883-888. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.023. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
5
Diagnostic imaging and biopsy pathways following abnormal screen-film and digital screening mammography.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):879-87. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2466-5. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
7
Current realities of delivering mammography services in the community: do challenges with staffing and scheduling exist?
Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):391-5. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352040132. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
8
Facility Mammography Volume in Relation to Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes.
J Med Screen. 2016 Mar;23(1):31-7. doi: 10.1177/0969141315595254. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
9
Mammography capacity and appointment wait times: barriers to breast cancer screening.
Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Jan;23(1):45-50. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9853-1. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
10
Mammography and Breast Ultrasonography Services in Ghana, Availability, and Geographic Access.
JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Aug;10:e2400218. doi: 10.1200/GO.24.00218.

引用本文的文献

2
Supplemental breast cancer screening after negative mammography in US women with dense breasts.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Jun 1;117(6):1271-1275. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae272.
3
Racial and Ethnic Variation in Diagnostic Mammography Performance among Women Reporting a Breast Lump.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Nov 1;32(11):1542-1551. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0289.
5
The Effect of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Adoption on Facility-Level Breast Cancer Screening Volume.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):957-963. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19350. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Underutilization of Supplemental Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Among Patients at High Breast Cancer Risk.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jun;27(6):748-754. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6623. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Dense breast legislation in the United States: state of the states.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Dec;10(12):899-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007.
2
Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan;174(1):125-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11963.
3
Rapid increase in breast magnetic resonance imaging use: trends from 2000 to 2011.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan;174(1):114-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11958.
4
Changes in the availability of screening mammography, 2000-2010.
Cancer. 2013 Nov 1;119(21):3847-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28305. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
5
Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research.
Radiology. 2012 Sep;264(3):632-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120184.
6
Reducing the rate of repeat imaging: import of outside images to PACS.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):628-34. doi: 10.2214/ajr.11.6890.
7
8
Race versus place of service in mortality among medicare beneficiaries with cancer.
Cancer. 2010 Jun 1;116(11):2698-706. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25097.
9
Geographic access and the use of screening mammography.
Med Care. 2010 Apr;48(4):349-56. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca3ecb.
10
Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 3;101(11):814-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp105. Epub 2009 May 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验