Suppr超能文献

为弱势群体提供筛查服务的机构中先进乳腺成像技术的可及性。

Availability of Advanced Breast Imaging at Screening Facilities Serving Vulnerable Populations.

作者信息

Lee Christoph I, Bogart Andy, Germino Jessica C, Goldman L Elizabeth, Hubbard Rebecca A, Haas Jennifer S, Hill Deirdre A, Tosteson Anna Na, Alford-Teaster Jennifer A, DeMartini Wendy B, Lehman Constance D, Onega Tracy L

机构信息

Dept of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine; 825 Eastlake Avenue East, Seattle, WA 98109 Dept of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health; 825 Eastlake Avenue East, Seattle, WA 98109

Group Health Research Institute; 1730 Minor Avenue #1600, Seattle, WA, 98101.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2016 Mar;23(1):24-30. doi: 10.1177/0969141315591616. Epub 2015 Jun 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Among vulnerable women, unequal access to advanced breast imaging modalities beyond screening mammography may lead to delays in cancer diagnosis and unfavourable outcomes. We aimed to compare on-site availability of advanced breast imaging services (ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and image-guided biopsy) between imaging facilities serving vulnerable patient populations and those serving non-vulnerable populations.

SETTING

73 imaging facilities across five Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium regional registries in the United States during 2011 and 2012.

METHODS

We examined facility and patient characteristics across a large, national sample of imaging facilities and patients served. We characterized facilities as serving vulnerable populations based on the proportion of mammograms performed on women with lower educational attainment, lower median income, racial/ethnic minority status, and rural residence.We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine relative risks of on-site availability of advanced imaging at facilities serving vulnerable women versus facilities serving non-vulnerable women.

RESULTS

Facilities serving vulnerable populations were as likely (Relative risk [RR] for MRI = 0.71, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.42, 1.19; RR for MRI-guided biopsy = 1.07 [0.61, 1.90]; RR for stereotactic biopsy = 1.18 [0.75, 1.85]) or more likely (RR for ultrasound = 1.38 [95% CI 1.09, 1.74]; RR for ultrasound-guided biopsy = 1.67 [1.30, 2.14]) to offer advanced breast imaging services as those serving non-vulnerable populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced breast imaging services are physically available on-site for vulnerable women in the United States, but it is unknown whether factors such as insurance coverage or out-of-pocket costs might limit their use.

摘要

目的

在易受伤害的女性群体中,除了乳腺钼靶筛查之外,无法平等获得先进的乳腺成像检查可能会导致癌症诊断延迟和不良后果。我们旨在比较为易受伤害患者群体服务的成像机构与为非易受伤害群体服务的成像机构之间先进乳腺成像服务(超声、磁共振成像[MRI]和图像引导活检)的现场可及性。

设置

2011年和2012年期间,美国乳腺癌监测联盟五个区域登记处的73家成像机构。

方法

我们研究了大量全国性成像机构样本及其所服务患者的机构和患者特征。我们根据接受乳腺钼靶检查的女性的教育程度较低、收入中位数较低、种族/族裔少数群体身份以及农村居住情况,将这些机构界定为为易受伤害群体服务。我们进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定为易受伤害女性群体服务的机构与为非易受伤害女性群体服务的机构相比,现场提供先进成像检查的相对风险。

结果

为易受伤害群体服务的机构提供先进乳腺成像服务的可能性与为非易受伤害群体服务的机构相同(MRI的相对风险[RR]=0.71,95%置信区间[CI]为0.42,1.19;MRI引导活检的RR=1.07[0.61,1.90];立体定向活检的RR=1.18[0.75,1.85]),或者更有可能(超声的RR=1.38[95%CI为1.09,1.74];超声引导活检的RR=1.67[1.30,2.14])。

结论

在美国,先进的乳腺成像服务在现场可为易受伤害的女性群体提供,但保险覆盖范围或自付费用等因素是否会限制其使用尚不清楚。

相似文献

1
Availability of Advanced Breast Imaging at Screening Facilities Serving Vulnerable Populations.
J Med Screen. 2016 Mar;23(1):24-30. doi: 10.1177/0969141315591616. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
4
Advanced Breast Imaging Availability by Screening Facility Characteristics.
Acad Radiol. 2015 Jul;22(7):846-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
5
Accuracy of diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women.
Med Care. 2011 Jan;49(1):67-75. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f380e0.
7
Underutilization of Supplemental Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Among Patients at High Breast Cancer Risk.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jun;27(6):748-754. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6623. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
8
Mammography facilities serving vulnerable women have longer follow-up times.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):226-233. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13083. Epub 2018 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

2
Social determinants of health and health inequities in breast cancer screening: a scoping review.
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;12:1354717. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354717. eCollection 2024.
3
Addressing Disparities Related to Access of Multimodality Breast Imaging Services Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Acad Radiol. 2022 Dec;29(12):1852-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.03.017. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
4
Imaging Surveillance Options for Individuals With a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Expert Panel Narrative Review.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Dec;219(6):854-868. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27635. Epub 2022 May 11.
5
Identifying key barriers to effective breast cancer control in rural settings.
Prev Med. 2021 Nov;152(Pt 2):106741. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106741. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
7
Availability Versus Utilization of Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Post Passage of Breast Density Legislation.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Apr;30(4):579-586. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8528. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Addressing Potential Health Disparities in the Adoption of Advanced Breast Imaging Technologies.
Acad Radiol. 2018 May;25(5):547-551. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.05.021.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2499-507. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.6095.
2
Geographic access to breast imaging for US women.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Sep;11(9):874-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
3
Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan;174(1):125-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11963.
5
Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research.
Radiology. 2012 Sep;264(3):632-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120184.
6
Identifying risk factors for disparities in breast cancer mortality among African-American and Hispanic women.
Womens Health Issues. 2012 May-Jun;22(3):e267-76. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.11.007. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
8
Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammogram: variability of facilities.
Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):404-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102472. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验