Schargus Marc, Kohlhaas Markus, Unterlauft Jan Darius
1Department of Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
2University Eye Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jun;31(5):291-5. doi: 10.1089/jop.2014.0161. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
Promising healing effects by albumin eye drops (AED) on the corneal epithelium have been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively if AED are an effective treatment for severe ocular surface defects and if recurrences can be reduced.
Seventeen patients with persistent epithelial defects (PED) and 30 patients with sterile corneal ulcers (CU) were treated either with 5% AED or 0.1% hyaluronan eye drops (HED) 8 times daily until complete epithelium closure. Sizes of the corneal defects, length of treatment and follow-up period, as well as recurrence rate were evaluated. Follow-up of PED was carried out for 126 ± 21 days in the AED group and 142 ± 39 days in the HED group. For CU cases, regular follow-up visits were performed for 117 ± 15 days in the AED group and 112 ± 28 days in the HED group.
Nine patients in PED group were treated for 11 ± 4 days with AED and the HED group (8 patients) was treated for 10 ± 3 days until corneal epithelium was closed, with only one recurrence in the HED group (P = 0.67). Fifteen patients in CU group were treated for 18 ± 6 days with AED and the HED group (15 patients) was treated for 21 ± 7 days until epithelial closure, with 1 recurrence in the AED group and 8 in the HED group (P = 0.03).
This comparative retrospective case-control study showed that AED are able to close corneal epithelial defects like CU and PED as good as HED. Even though times of healing were similar for both treatments, AED seem to reduce the recurrence of sterile CU. Our findings suggest that AED might be beneficial in the management of ocular surface epithelial damage; however, further larger studies are necessary to confirm these results.
已证实白蛋白滴眼液(AED)对角膜上皮具有良好的愈合效果。本研究的目的是回顾性分析AED是否是治疗严重眼表缺陷的有效方法,以及是否可以减少复发。
17例持续性上皮缺损(PED)患者和30例无菌性角膜溃疡(CU)患者,每天使用5%AED或0.1%透明质酸钠滴眼液(HED)8次,直至上皮完全闭合。评估角膜缺损大小、治疗时间和随访期以及复发率。PED患者在AED组的随访时间为126±21天,在HED组为142±39天。对于CU病例,AED组定期随访117±15天,HED组定期随访112±28天。
PED组9例患者使用AED治疗11±4天,HED组(8例患者)治疗10±3天直至角膜上皮闭合,HED组仅1例复发(P=0.67)。CU组15例患者使用AED治疗18±6天,HED组(15例患者)治疗21±7天直至上皮闭合,AED组1例复发,HED组8例复发(P=0.03)。
这项比较性回顾性病例对照研究表明,AED在闭合角膜上皮缺损方面与HED一样有效,如CU和PED。尽管两种治疗的愈合时间相似,但AED似乎能降低无菌性CU的复发率。我们的研究结果表明,AED可能对眼表上皮损伤的治疗有益;然而,需要进一步的大型研究来证实这些结果。