Suppr超能文献

制定一项规范期刊文章中生物资源引用的指南(CoBRA)。

Developing a guideline to standardize the citation of bioresources in journal articles (CoBRA).

作者信息

Bravo Elena, Calzolari Alessia, De Castro Paola, Mabile Laurence, Napolitani Federica, Rossi Anna Maria, Cambon-Thomsen Anne

出版信息

BMC Med. 2015 Feb 17;13:33. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0266-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many biomedical publications refer to data obtained from collections of biosamples. Sharing such bioresources (biological samples, data, and databases) is paramount for the present governance of research. Recognition of the effort involved in generating, maintaining, and sharing high quality bioresources is poorly organized, which does not encourage sharing. At publication level, the recognition of such resources is often neglected and/or highly heterogeneous. This is a true handicap for the traceability of bioresource use. The aim of this article is to propose, for the first time, a guideline for reporting bioresource use in research articles, named CoBRA: Citation of BioResources in journal Articles.

METHODS

As standards for citing bioresources are still lacking, the members of the journal editors subgroup of the Bioresource Research Impact Factor (BRIF) initiative developed a standardized and appropriate citation scheme for such resources by informing stakeholders about the subject and raising awareness among scientists and in science editors' networks, mapping this topic among other relevant initiatives, promoting actions addressed to stakeholders, launching surveys, and organizing focused workshops.

RESULTS

The European Association of Science Editors has adopted BRIF's suggestion to incorporate statements on biobanks in the Methods section of their guidelines. The BRIF subgroup agreed upon a proposed citation system: each individual bioresource that is used to perform a study and that is mentioned in the Methods section should be cited as an individual "reference [BIORESOURCE]" according to a delineated format. The EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) network mentioned the proposed reporting guideline in their "guidelines under development" section.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluating bioresources' use and impact requires that publications accurately cite such resources. Adopting the standard citation scheme described here will improve the quality of bioresource reporting and will allow their traceability in scientific publications, thus increasing the recognition of bioresources' value and relevance to research. Please see related article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0284-9.

摘要

背景

许多生物医学出版物都提及从生物样本库中获取的数据。对于当前的研究管理而言,共享此类生物资源(生物样本、数据和数据库)至关重要。然而,对于生成、维护和共享高质量生物资源所涉及的努力,目前的认可机制组织不善,这不利于鼓励共享。在出版物层面,对这类资源的认可往往被忽视且/或高度不一致。这对于生物资源使用的可追溯性而言是一个真正的障碍。本文旨在首次提出一项在研究论文中报告生物资源使用情况的指南,即CoBRA:期刊文章中生物资源的引用。

方法

由于目前仍缺乏引用生物资源的标准,生物资源研究影响因子(BRIF)倡议的期刊编辑子组成员通过向利益相关者通报该主题、提高科学家和科学编辑网络中的认识、在其他相关倡议中梳理此主题、推动针对利益相关者的行动、开展调查以及组织专题研讨会,为这类资源制定了一个标准化且合适的引用方案。

结果

欧洲科学编辑协会采纳了BRIF的建议,即在其指南的“方法”部分纳入关于生物样本库的说明。BRIF子组就提议的引用系统达成了一致:在“方法”部分提及的、用于开展研究的每一份单独的生物资源,都应按照规定格式作为单独的“参考文献[生物资源]”进行引用。EQUATOR(提高卫生研究的质量和透明度)网络在其“正在制定的指南”部分提到了提议的报告指南。

结论

评估生物资源的使用和影响需要出版物准确引用此类资源。采用本文所述的标准引用方案将提高生物资源报告的质量,并使其在科学出版物中具有可追溯性,从而提高对生物资源价值及其与研究相关性的认可度。请参阅相关文章:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0284-9。

相似文献

5
Open data sharing in the context of bioresources.生物资源背景下的开放数据共享。
Acta Inform Med. 2013 Dec;21(4):291-2. doi: 10.5455/aim.2013.21.291-292. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
8
Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.荟萃分析:俄罗斯出版物存在的问题。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S89-90. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150702.
10
Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.期刊中热门话题的影响因素及预测
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):343-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111209. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the impact of biobanks and cohort studies.量化生物样本库和队列研究的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 22;122(16):e2427157122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2427157122. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
10
Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.提高学术出版的透明度和科学严谨性。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2019 Feb;2(1):e1150. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1150. Epub 2018 Dec 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations for the role of publishers in access to data.关于出版商在数据获取方面作用的建议。
PLoS Biol. 2014 Oct 28;12(10):e1001975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001975. eCollection 2014 Oct.
4
Open data sharing in the context of bioresources.生物资源背景下的开放数据共享。
Acta Inform Med. 2013 Dec;21(4):291-2. doi: 10.5455/aim.2013.21.291-292. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
9
The importance of clinical trial data sharing: toward more open science.临床试验数据共享的重要性:迈向更开放的科学。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):238-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965798.
10
Better provenance for biobank samples.生物样本库样本更可靠的来源。
Nature. 2011 Jul 27;475(7357):454-5. doi: 10.1038/475454d.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验