Suppr超能文献

临床定义的急性排斥反应表型与肾移植长期存活相关。

Acute Rejection Clinically Defined Phenotypes Correlate With Long-term Renal Allograft Survival.

作者信息

Krisl Jill C, Alloway Rita R, Shield Adele Rike, Govil Amit, Mogilishetty Gautham, Cardi Michael, Diwan Tayyab, Abu Jawdeh Bassam G, Girnita Alin, Witte David, Woodle E Steve

机构信息

1 Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX. 2 Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH. 3 University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. 4 The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH. 5 Kidney and Hypertension Center, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2015 Oct;99(10):2167-73. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000706.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Classification of acute rejection (AR) based on etiology and timing may provide a means for enhancing therapeutic results and allograft survival. This study evaluated graft and patient survival after the first AR episodes among kidney transplant recipients with an early or late antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), acute cellular rejection (ACR) or mixed AR (MAR).

METHODS

A prospective institutional review board-approved database was queried to identify biopsy-proven first AR episodes occurring from January 2005 to October 2012. The ACR was defined by Banff criteria; borderline AR was excluded. The AMR was defined as 3 of 4 criteria: renal dysfunction, donor specific antibody, C4d positivity on biopsy, and histological changes. The MAR met criteria for both ACR and AMR. Early AR occurred within six months post-transplant. AR episodes were then assigned to 1 of the 6 categories--early AMR, early ACR, early MAR, late AMR, late ACR, and late MAR.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-two kidney transplant recipients identified with a first AR episode. Mean follow-up was 773 days (± 715 days). No difference was observed in patient survival. Death-censored graft survival was 84%. Death-censored graft loss was higher with late versus early AMR (P = 0.01) and late versus early ACR (P = 0.03), but not late versus early MAR (P = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The AR type demonstrated a hierarchy for graft survival with ACR better than MAR better than AMR, which persisted for both early and late AR. Improvement in long-term results of AR may require development of specific treatment for individual AR types.

摘要

背景

基于病因和时间对急性排斥反应(AR)进行分类,可能为提高治疗效果和同种异体移植物存活率提供一种方法。本研究评估了早期或晚期抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)、急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)或混合性AR(MAR)的肾移植受者首次AR发作后的移植物和患者存活率。

方法

查询前瞻性机构审查委员会批准的数据库,以确定2005年1月至2012年10月间经活检证实的首次AR发作。ACR由班夫标准定义;排除临界AR。AMR定义为以下4项标准中的3项:肾功能障碍、供体特异性抗体、活检时C4d阳性和组织学改变。MAR符合ACR和AMR的标准。早期AR发生在移植后6个月内。然后将AR发作分为6类中的1类——早期AMR、早期ACR、早期MAR、晚期AMR、晚期ACR和晚期MAR。

结果

182例肾移植受者被确定为首次AR发作。平均随访时间为773天(±715天)。患者存活率未观察到差异。死亡截尾移植物存活率为84%。晚期AMR与早期AMR相比(P = 0.01)以及晚期ACR与早期ACR相比(P = 0.03),死亡截尾移植物丢失率更高,但晚期MAR与早期MAR相比(P = 0.3)则不然。

结论

AR类型在移植物存活方面表现出一种层次结构,ACR优于MAR优于AMR,这在早期和晚期AR中均持续存在。AR长期结果的改善可能需要针对个体AR类型开发特异性治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验