Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚医疗保健相关感染监测实践的差异。

Variation in health care-associated infection surveillance practices in Australia.

作者信息

Russo Philip L, Cheng Allen C, Richards Michael, Graves Nicholas, Hall Lisa

机构信息

Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology Unit, Alfred Health, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jul 1;43(7):773-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

Abstract

In the absence of a national health care-associated infection surveillance program in Australia, differences between existing state-based programs were explored using an online survey. Only 51% of respondents who undertake surveillance have been trained, fewer than half perform surgical site infection surveillance prospectively, and only 41% indicated they risk adjust surgical site infection data. Widespread variation of surveillance methods highlights future challenges when considering the development and implementation of a national program in Australia.

摘要

在澳大利亚缺乏全国性医疗保健相关感染监测项目的情况下,通过在线调查探讨了现有各州项目之间的差异。进行监测的受访者中只有51%接受过培训,不到一半的人前瞻性地开展手术部位感染监测,只有41%的人表示他们对手术部位感染数据进行风险调整。监测方法的广泛差异凸显了在澳大利亚考虑制定和实施全国性项目时未来面临的挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验