• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

书面信息干预对降低心力衰竭患者再入院费用的疗效:一项系统评价和Meta分析

The Efficacy of Written Information Intervention in Reduction of Hospital Re-admission Cost in Patients With Heart Failure; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zarea Gavgani Vahideh, Kazemi Majd Faranak, Nosratnejad Shirin, Golmohammadi Ali, Sadeghi-Bazargani Homayoun

机构信息

Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, National public Health Management Center (NPMC), and Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Faculty of Management and Health Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2015;7(1):1-5. doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2015.01. Epub 2015 Mar 29.

DOI:10.15171/jcvtr.2015.01
PMID:25859308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4378668/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of written information versus non written information intervention in reducing hospital readmission cost, if prescribed or presented to the patients with HF.

METHODS

The study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched Medline (Ovid) and Cochrane library during the past 20 years from 1993 to 2013. We also conducted a manual search through Google Scholar and a direct search in the group of related journals in Black Well and Science Direct trough their websites. Two reviewers appraised the identified studies, and meta-analysis was done to estimate the mean saving cost of patient readmission. All the included studies must have been done by randomization to be eligible for study.

RESULT

We assessed the full-texts 3 out of 65 studies with 754 patients and average age of 74.33. The mean of estimated saving readmission cost in intervention group versus control group was US $2751 (95% CI: 2708 - 2794) and the mean of total saving cost in intervention group versus control group was US $2047 (base year 2010) with (95% CI: 2004 - 2089). No publication bias was found by testing the heterogeneity of studies.

CONCLUSION

One of the effective factors in minimizing the healthcare cost and preventing from hospital re-admission is providing the patients with information prescription in a written format. It is suggested that hospital management, Medicare organizations, policy makers and individual physicians consider the prescription of appropriate medical information as the indispensable part of patient's care process.

摘要

目的

评估书面信息干预与非书面信息干预在降低心力衰竭(HF)患者再次住院费用方面的效果,前提是已向患者开具或提供了相关信息。

方法

本研究为系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了1993年至2013年过去20年间的Medline(Ovid)和Cochrane图书馆。我们还通过谷歌学术进行了手动检索,并通过其网站在Black Well和Science Direct的相关期刊组中进行了直接检索。两名评审员对纳入的研究进行了评估,并进行荟萃分析以估计患者再次住院的平均节省费用。所有纳入研究必须通过随机分组进行,才有资格纳入研究。

结果

我们评估了65项研究中的3项全文,涉及754名患者,平均年龄为74.33岁。干预组与对照组相比,估计节省的再次住院费用均值为2751美元(95%置信区间:2708 - 2794),干预组与对照组相比,总节省费用均值为2047美元(以2010年为基准年),95%置信区间为2004 - 2089。通过检验研究的异质性未发现发表偏倚。

结论

将书面形式的信息处方提供给患者是降低医疗成本和预防再次住院的有效因素之一。建议医院管理层、医疗保险组织、政策制定者和个体医生将开具适当的医疗信息视为患者护理过程中不可或缺的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ea/4378668/920f2311fa71/JCVTR-7-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ea/4378668/0feb9273a80d/JCVTR-7-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ea/4378668/82c4d2454256/JCVTR-7-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ea/4378668/920f2311fa71/JCVTR-7-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ea/4378668/0feb9273a80d/JCVTR-7-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ea/4378668/82c4d2454256/JCVTR-7-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ea/4378668/920f2311fa71/JCVTR-7-1-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Efficacy of Written Information Intervention in Reduction of Hospital Re-admission Cost in Patients With Heart Failure; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.书面信息干预对降低心力衰竭患者再入院费用的疗效:一项系统评价和Meta分析
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2015;7(1):1-5. doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2015.01. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
2
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review.反馈教学法对慢性病患者健康教育中依从性和自我管理的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan;14(1):210-47. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296.
5
The effectiveness of disease management programmes in reducing hospital re-admission in older patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports.疾病管理项目对降低老年心力衰竭患者再次入院率的有效性:已发表报告的系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Heart J. 2004 Sep;25(18):1570-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.022.
6
7
Effectiveness of heart failure management programmes with nurse-led discharge planning in reducing re-admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.以护士主导的出院计划为特色的心力衰竭管理方案在降低再入院率方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 May;49(5):610-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
8
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
9
10
Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home.对于从急症医院出院回家的患者,书面和口头信息与仅口头信息的对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(4):CD003716. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003716.

引用本文的文献

1
Is alcohol and psychoactive medication use associated with excess hospital length-of-stay and admission frequency? A cross-sectional, observational study.酒精和精神活性药物的使用是否与住院时间延长和住院频率增加有关?一项横断面、观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 16;24(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00979-y.
2
Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement Interventions Designed to Prevent Hospital Readmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.旨在预防医院再入院的质量改进干预措施的经济评估:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):975-985. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1136.

本文引用的文献

1
Information prescriptions, 1930-2013: an international history and comprehensive review.信息处方,1930-2013:国际历史与综合述评。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Oct;102(4):271-80. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.4.008.
2
Atrial fibrillation and heart failure: treatment considerations for a dual epidemic.心房颤动与心力衰竭:双重流行疾病的治疗考量
Circulation. 2009 May 12;119(18):2516-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.821306.
3
Randomized clinical trial of a postdischarge pharmaceutical care program vs regular follow-up in patients with heart failure.
心力衰竭患者出院后药物治疗护理计划与常规随访的随机临床试验。
Farm Hosp. 2006 Nov-Dec;30(6):328-42. doi: 10.1016/s1130-6343(06)74004-1.
4
Systematic review of multidisciplinary interventions in heart failure.心力衰竭多学科干预的系统评价
Heart. 2005 Jul;91(7):899-906. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.048389.
5
Multicenter randomized trial of a comprehensive hospital discharge and outpatient heart failure management program.一项关于综合医院出院及门诊心力衰竭管理项目的多中心随机试验。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2004 Aug;6(5):643-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2003.11.023.
6
Heart failure.心力衰竭
N Engl J Med. 2003 May 15;348(20):2007-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra021498.
7
The current cost of heart failure to the National Health Service in the UK.目前心力衰竭给英国国民医疗服务体系带来的成本。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2002 Jun;4(3):361-71. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(01)00198-2.
8
Cross-national comparisons of health systems using OECD data, 1999.利用经合组织数据进行的1999年卫生系统跨国比较。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 May-Jun;21(3):169-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.169.
9
Prevalence of left-ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure in the Echocardiographic Heart of England Screening study: a population based study.英格兰超声心动图心脏筛查研究中左心室收缩功能障碍和心力衰竭的患病率:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet. 2001 Aug 11;358(9280):439-44. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05620-3.
10
Home-based intervention: the next step in treatment of chronic heart failure?家庭干预:慢性心力衰竭治疗的下一步?
Eur Heart J. 2000 Nov;21(22):1807-9. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2112.