• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

InsCor与三个国际评分系统在圣卡莎·德玛丽利亚心脏外科手术中的表现。

Performance of InsCor and three international scores in cardiac surgery at Santa Casa de Marília.

作者信息

Tiveron Marcos Gradim, Bomfim Helton Augusto, Simplício Maycon Soto, Bergonso Marcos Henriques, Matos Milena Paiva Brasil de, Ferreira Sergio Marques, Pelloso Eraldo Antônio, Barros Rubens Tofano de

机构信息

Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Marília, Marília, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2015 Jan-Mar;30(1):1-8. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140116.

DOI:10.5935/1678-9741.20140116
PMID:25859861
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4389514/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To apply and to compare the Society of Thoracic Surgery score (STS), EuroSCORE (Eurosc1), EuroSCORE II (Eurosc2) and InsCor (IS) for predicting mortality in patients undergoing to coronary artery bypass graft and/or valve surgery at the Santa Casa Marilia.

METHODS

The present study is a cohort. It is a prospective, observational, analytical and unicentric. We analyzed 562 consecutive patients coronary artery bypass graft and/or valve surgery, between April 2011 and June 2013 at the Santa Casa Marilia. Mortality was calculated for each patient through the scores STS, Eurosc1, Eurosc2 and IS. The calibration was calculated using the Hosmer Lemeshow test and discrimination by ROC curve.

RESULTS

The hospital mortality was 4,6%. The calibration is generally adequate group P=0.345, P=0.765, P=0.272 and P=0.062 for STS, Eurosc1, Eurosc2, and IS respectively. The discriminatory power of STS score 0.649 (95% CI 0.529 to 0.770, P=0.012), Eurosc1 0.706 (95% CI 0.589 to 0.823, P ≤0.001), Eurosc2 was 0.704 (95% CI 0.590-0.818 P=0.001) and InsCor 0.739 (95% CI 0.638 to 0.839, P ≤0.001).

CONCLUSION

We can say that overall, the InsCor was the best model, mainly in the discrimination of the sample. The InsCor showed good accuracy, in addition to being effective and easy to apply, especially by using a smaller number of variables compared to the other models.

摘要

目的

应用并比较胸外科医师协会评分(STS)、欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE,Eurosc1)、欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统Ⅱ(EuroSCORE II,Eurosc2)和InsCor(IS),以预测在圣卡桑马里利亚医院接受冠状动脉旁路移植术和/或瓣膜手术患者的死亡率。

方法

本研究为队列研究。它是前瞻性、观察性、分析性和单中心的。我们分析了2011年4月至2013年6月期间在圣卡桑马里利亚医院连续接受冠状动脉旁路移植术和/或瓣膜手术的562例患者。通过STS、Eurosc1、Eurosc2和IS评分计算每位患者的死亡率。使用Hosmer Lemeshow检验计算校准度,并通过ROC曲线进行鉴别分析。

结果

医院死亡率为4.6%。校准度总体上是合适的,STS、Eurosc1、Eurosc2和IS的P值分别为0.345、0.765、0.272和0.062。STS评分的鉴别力为0.649(95%可信区间0.529至0.770,P = 0.012),Eurosc1为0.706(95%可信区间0.589至0.823,P≤0.001),Eurosc2为0.704(95%可信区间0.590 - 0.818,P = 0.001),InsCor为0.739(95%可信区间0.638至0.839,P≤0.001)。

结论

总体而言,我们可以说InsCor是最佳模型,主要体现在对样本的鉴别方面。InsCor除了有效且易于应用外,还具有良好的准确性,特别是与其他模型相比,它使用的变量数量更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee4/4389514/9904b6decf69/rbccv-30-01-0001-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee4/4389514/9904b6decf69/rbccv-30-01-0001-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee4/4389514/9904b6decf69/rbccv-30-01-0001-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of InsCor and three international scores in cardiac surgery at Santa Casa de Marília.InsCor与三个国际评分系统在圣卡莎·德玛丽利亚心脏外科手术中的表现。
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2015 Jan-Mar;30(1):1-8. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140116.
2
EuroSCORE II and the importance of a local model, InsCor and the future SP-SCORE.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)与本地模型的重要性、InsCor以及未来的SP评分系统(SP-SCORE)
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014 Jan-Mar;29(1):1-8. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140004.
3
Age, Creatinine and Ejection Fraction Score in Brazil: Comparison with InsCor and the EuroSCORE.巴西的年龄、肌酐和射血分数评分:与InsCor及欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)的比较。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015 Nov;105(5):450-6. doi: 10.5935/abc.20150101. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Analysis of the InsCor Score as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.分析 InsCor 评分对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者死亡率的预测价值。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Aug 6;36(4):492-499. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0339.
5
Performance of EuroSCORE II in a large US database: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)在美国大型数据库中的表现:对经导管主动脉瓣植入术的影响
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Sep;46(3):400-8; discussion 408. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu033. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
6
Comparing Performance of Risk Scores for Combined Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery.比较主动脉瓣置换术与冠状动脉旁路移植术联合手术风险评分的性能。
Heart Lung Circ. 2016 Nov;25(11):1118-1123. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Validation of new york operative mortality risk score for valve and valve/coronary artery bypass grafting operations.新纽约手术死亡率风险评分在瓣膜和瓣膜/冠状动脉旁路移植手术中的验证。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;95(4):1291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
8
InsCor: a simple and accurate method for risk assessment in heart surgery.InsCor:一种用于心脏手术风险评估的简单而准确的方法。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Mar;100(3):246-54. doi: 10.5935/abc.20130043.
9
Assessment of EuroSCORE II and STS Score Performance and the Impact of Surgical Urgency in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery at a Referral Center in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗转诊中心行单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术的 EuroSCORE II 和 STS 评分表现评估及手术紧急程度的影响。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep 6;39(5):e20230282. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0282.
10
The Performance of the Current Risk Prediction Scoring Systems in Patients Undergoing Anaortic Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.现行风险预测评分系统在非体外循环主动脉瓣下冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jun 7;36(22):e163. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e163.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality risk prediction models in adult cardiac surgery.系统评价和荟萃分析成人心脏手术死亡率风险预测模型。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Oct 29;33(5):673-686. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab151.
2
Mortality Risk After Cardiac Surgery: Application of Inscor in a University Hospital in Brazil's Northeast.心脏手术后的死亡风险:Inscor在巴西东北部一家大学医院的应用。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):396-399. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20160080.
3
Application of Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Predictors After Elective Cardiac Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score system for isolated coronary bypass graft surgery in a Brazilian population.巴西人群中单纯冠状动脉搭桥手术的胸外科医师协会评分系统评估
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014 Jan-Mar;29(1):51-8. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140011.
2
EuroSCORE II and the importance of a local model, InsCor and the future SP-SCORE.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)与本地模型的重要性、InsCor以及未来的SP评分系统(SP-SCORE)
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014 Jan-Mar;29(1):1-8. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140004.
3
Prospective validation of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Argentinean centres.
择期心脏手术后机械通气撤机预测指标的应用
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):605-9. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20150076.
欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)在阿根廷各中心接受心脏手术患者中的前瞻性验证。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 May;18(5):539-43. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt550. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
4
Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery: external validation of EuroSCORE II in a prospective regional registry.心脏手术后院内死亡的风险分层:在一个前瞻性区域登记处对欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)进行外部验证
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Nov;46(5):840-8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt657. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Comparison of four risk scores for contemporary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.比较四种风险评分系统在当代单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用。
Heart Lung Circ. 2014 May;23(5):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
6
Heart surgery programs innovation using surgical risk stratification at the São Paulo State Public Healthcare System: SP-SCORE-SUS study.
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013 Jun;28(2):263-9. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130037.
7
InsCor: a simple and accurate method for risk assessment in heart surgery.InsCor:一种用于心脏手术风险评估的简单而准确的方法。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Mar;100(3):246-54. doi: 10.5935/abc.20130043.
8
Does EuroSCORE II perform better than its original versions? A multicentre validation study.EuroSCORE II 是否优于其原始版本?一项多中心验证研究。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Jan;34(1):22-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs342. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
9
Validation of the 2000 Bernstein-Parsonnet and EuroSCORE at the Heart Institute - USP.2000年伯恩斯坦 - 帕森内特评分和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)在圣保罗大学心脏研究所的验证。
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2012 Apr-Jun;27(2):187-94. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20120033.
10
EuroSCORE II.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统 II(EuroSCORE II)。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):734-44; discussion 744-5. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs043. Epub 2012 Feb 29.