Suppr超能文献

[全髁置换术后同侧全髋关节置换:假体间骨折风险?]

[Ipsilateral THA after stemmed TKA: Risk of interprosthetic fracture?].

作者信息

Dexel J, Hartmann A, Pyrc J, Günther K-P, Lützner J

机构信息

UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland,

出版信息

Orthopade. 2015 Jul;44(7):489-96. doi: 10.1007/s00132-015-3096-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing number of patients who have undergone stemmed total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in the same leg. These patients may be at increased risk of periprosthetic and interprostethic fracture. Etiology and the potential therapy strategies are not well represented in the current literature.

OBJECTIVES

Determination of the risk factors for interprosthetic fractures and possible prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a review of the literature and additionally a survey among experts (members of the German Association for Arthroplasty [AE]) to investigate the risk and the necessity for a preventive internal fixation.

RESULTS

There are only a few biomechanical studies. The interprosthetic distance seems to have little influence on the fracture risk, but the thickness of the cortex and the cortical area at the diaphysis seems to be important. The value of a bridging osteosynthesis remains uncertain. Ninety experts took part in the survey. The risk of fracture risk was estimated to be only slight to medium. Opinions regarding the necessity of preventive internal fixation were heterogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS

The indication for preventive internal fixation could be derived neither from the literature nor from the survey of experts. The thickness of the cortex and co-morbidities (osteoporosis, tendency to fall, and medication) seem to be more important than the interprosthetic distance.

摘要

背景

同一条腿接受带柄全膝关节置换术和全髋关节置换术的患者数量日益增加。这些患者发生假体周围骨折和假体间骨折的风险可能会增加。目前的文献中对病因及潜在治疗策略的描述并不充分。

目的

确定假体间骨折的危险因素及可能的预防措施。

材料与方法

我们进行了文献综述,并对专家(德国关节置换协会[AE]成员)进行了调查,以研究风险及预防性内固定的必要性。

结果

仅有少数生物力学研究。假体间距离似乎对骨折风险影响不大,但骨干皮质厚度和皮质面积似乎很重要。桥接骨固定术的价值仍不确定。90位专家参与了调查。骨折风险估计仅为轻度至中度。关于预防性内固定必要性的观点存在差异。

结论

预防性内固定的指征既无法从文献中得出,也无法从专家调查中得出。皮质厚度和合并症(骨质疏松症、跌倒倾向和药物治疗)似乎比假体间距离更为重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验