Hou Zhiyong, Moore Blake, Bowen Thomas R, Irgit Kaan, Matzko Michelle E, Strohecker Kent A, Smith Wade R
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1715-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821dd9f1.
The treatment of interprosthetic femoral fractures is challenging because of several factors. Poor bone stock, advanced age, potential prosthetic instability, and limited fracture fixation options both proximally and distally can complicate standard femur fracture treatment procedures. The purpose of this report was to describe our experience treating interprosthetic femoral fractures, providing an emphasis on treatment principles and specific intraoperative management.
All patients with fractures occurring between ipsilateral hip and knee prostheses between 2004 and 2010 were identified from a comprehensive database and included in this study. Patients had been treated using principles adapted from two isolated periprosthetic fracture classification systems, the Vancouver and Su classifications. The electronic medical record (including inpatient medical records, operative notes, outpatient medical records, and all radiographs) was reviewed for each patient and demographic and treatment-related variables as well as complications and outcomes were recorded.
Thirteen consecutive patients with interprosthetic fractures were included. Four fractures occurred around a clearly loose prosthesis, which were subsequently treated with long-stemmed revisions. The remaining 12 fractures were treated with a locked-plate construct. Two of nine patients (22.2%) died before fracture union. Follow-up averaged 28 months ± 4 months, with fracture union achieved at an average of 4.7 months ± 0.3 months. All patients returned to their self-reported preoperative ambulatory status except one who developed a loose hip prosthesis at 3-year follow-up after fracture union.
The principles for treatment of isolated periprosthetic fractures are useful to guide the fixation of interprosthetic fractures. Locked plating is an effective method for the treatment of interprosthetic femoral fractures. Bypassing the adjacent prosthesis by a minimum of two femoral diameters is a necessary technique to prevent a stress riser.
由于多种因素,人工关节周围股骨骨折的治疗具有挑战性。骨量不足、高龄、假体潜在不稳定以及远近端骨折固定选择有限,会使标准股骨骨折治疗程序变得复杂。本报告的目的是描述我们治疗人工关节周围股骨骨折的经验,重点强调治疗原则和具体的术中管理。
从一个综合数据库中识别出2004年至2010年间在同侧髋膝关节假体之间发生骨折的所有患者,并纳入本研究。患者的治疗采用了源自两个独立的人工关节周围骨折分类系统(温哥华分类和苏分类)的原则。对每位患者的电子病历(包括住院病历、手术记录、门诊病历和所有X光片)进行了回顾,并记录了人口统计学和治疗相关变量以及并发症和结果。
纳入了13例连续的人工关节周围骨折患者。4例骨折发生在明显松动的假体周围,随后采用长柄翻修术治疗。其余12例骨折采用锁定钢板结构治疗。9例患者中有2例(22.2%)在骨折愈合前死亡。随访平均28个月±4个月,平均4.7个月±0.3个月实现骨折愈合。除1例在骨折愈合后3年随访时出现髋关节假体松动外,所有患者均恢复到自我报告的术前活动状态。
孤立的人工关节周围骨折的治疗原则有助于指导人工关节周围骨折的固定。锁定钢板是治疗人工关节周围股骨骨折的有效方法。至少绕过相邻假体两个股骨直径是防止应力集中的必要技术。