1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. 2Department of Anesthesiology, ESI-Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science & Research, Kolkata, India. 3Department of Anesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1745-56. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001012.
The inadvertent loss of an entire guide wire during central venous catheterization can lead to serious patient harm and require additional investigations as well as retrieval procedures. We aimed to analyze globally published reports of lost wires during central venous catheterization to understand its possible etiology, presentation, treatment, and outcomes with an objective of finding solutions to make the procedure safer.
MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL, supplemented by scanning the reference lists of relevant publications.
All reports describing an inadvertent intravascular loss of a complete guide wire during placement of central venous catheters published up to December 2014 were included. Reports exclusively describing the 1) retrieval method, 2) partially retained guide wires, and 3) entrapped guide wires during withdrawal were excluded.
In each instance, we collected data about the method of the missed guide wire detection, the time interval between the procedure and detection, the supplementary investigations performed to confirm the diagnosis, and the risk factors associated with such events as well as the complications, the final outcome, and the wire retrieval methods used.
A systematic analysis of the accessed publications was performed.
Over the last decade, the number of reported instances of lost guide wires during central venous catheterization has increased rapidly. Unsupervised or improperly supervised insertions of the central catheters by trainees, distractions during insertions, and high workload are the main risk factors. A retained guide wire increases the risk and cost of additional diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, as well as imposing many minor-to-serious life-threatening complications. Continuing education along with simulator-based skill development, vigilant supervision, and a shared workload during out of hours working are likely to prevent such occurrences.
中心静脉置管过程中,导丝完全丢失会导致严重的患者伤害,并需要进一步检查和检索程序。我们旨在分析全球发表的中心静脉置管过程中丢失导丝的报告,以了解其可能的病因、表现、治疗和结果,旨在找到使该程序更安全的解决方案。
MEDLINE、Scopus 和 CINAHL,并补充检索相关出版物的参考文献列表。
所有描述中心静脉置管过程中意外血管内丢失完整导丝的报告均被纳入。仅描述 1)检索方法、2)部分保留导丝和 3)退出时导丝被捕获的报告被排除在外。
在每种情况下,我们收集了有关以下数据:错过导丝检测的方法、程序和检测之间的时间间隔、为确认诊断而进行的补充检查、以及与此类事件相关的危险因素以及并发症、最终结果和使用的导丝检索方法。
对所访问的出版物进行了系统分析。
在过去十年中,报告的中心静脉置管过程中丢失导丝的实例数量迅速增加。未监督或监督不当的导管插入、插入过程中的分心以及高工作量是主要危险因素。保留导丝会增加额外诊断和治疗干预的风险和成本,并带来许多轻微至严重的危及生命的并发症。持续的教育以及基于模拟器的技能发展、警惕的监督和工作时间之外的共享工作量可能会防止此类事件发生。