Bramesfeld Anke, Pauletzki Jürgen, Behrenz Lars, Szecsenyi Joachim, Willms Gerald, Broge Björn
AQUA Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hanover, Germany.
AQUA Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Health Policy. 2015 Aug;119(8):1017-22. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
Since 2001, statutory external quality assurance (QA) for hospital care has been in place in the German health system. In 2009, the decision was taken to expand it to cross-sectoral procedures. This novel and unprecedented form of national QA aims at (1) making the quality procedures comparable that are provided both in inpatient and outpatient care, (2) following-up outcomes of hospital care after patients' discharge and (3) measuring the quality of complex treatment chains across interfaces. As a pioneer procedure a QA procedure in cataract surgery QA was developed. Using this as an example, challenges of cross-sectoral QA are highlighted. These challenges relate, in particular, to three technical problems: triggering cases for documentation, following-up patients' after hospital discharge, and the burden of documentation in outpatient care. These problems resulted finally in the haltering of the development of the QA procedure. However, the experiences gained with this first development of cross-sectoral QA inspired the reorientation and further development of the field in Germany. Future cross-sectoral QA will rigorously aim at keeping burden of documentation small. It will draw data for QA mainly at three sources: routine data, patient surveys and peer reviews using indicators. Policy implications of this reorientation are discussed.
自2001年以来,德国医疗体系中已建立了医院护理法定外部质量保证(QA)机制。2009年,决定将其扩展至跨部门程序。这种全新且史无前例的国家质量保证形式旨在:(1)使住院护理和门诊护理中提供的质量程序具有可比性;(2)在患者出院后跟踪医院护理的结果;(3)衡量跨接口复杂治疗链的质量。作为一项开创性程序,白内障手术质量保证程序得以开发。以该程序为例,凸显了跨部门质量保证的挑战。这些挑战尤其涉及三个技术问题:触发记录病例、患者出院后跟踪以及门诊护理中的记录负担。这些问题最终导致质量保证程序的开发停滞。然而,首次开展跨部门质量保证所积累的经验推动了德国该领域的重新定位和进一步发展。未来的跨部门质量保证将严格致力于保持较小的记录负担。它将主要从三个来源获取质量保证数据:常规数据、患者调查以及使用指标的同行评审。文中讨论了这一重新定位的政策影响。