• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有内连接、不同角度和厚度的氧化锆定制基台断裂载荷的体外比较:第二部分。

An In Vitro Comparison of Fracture Load of Zirconia Custom Abutments with Internal Connection and Different Angulations and Thicknesses: Part II.

作者信息

Zandparsa Roya, Albosefi Abdalah

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, Prosthodontics Division and Advanced Education in Esthetic Dentistry, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2016 Feb;25(2):151-5. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12292. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1111/jopr.12292
PMID:25865430
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of part II of this in vitro study was to compare the fracture load of two-piece zirconia custom abutments with different thicknesses and angulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty zirconia custom abutments were divided into four groups as follows: group A1: 0.7 mm thickness and 0° angulations; group A2: 0.7 mm thickness and 15° angulations; group B1: 1 mm thickness and 0° angulations; group B2: 1 mm thickness and 15° angulations. As in part I, in all groups, implant replicas were mounted in self-cure acrylic jigs to support the abutments. The zirconia custom abutments were engaged in the implant replicas using a manual torque wrench. All jigs were secured and mounted in a metallic vice and subjected to shear stress till failure using a universal testing machine with a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed with the force transferred to the lingual surface of the zirconia custom abutments 2 mm below the incisal edge. The test specimens used in this study did not include a crown. The universal testing machine was controlled via a computer software system, which also completed the stress-strain diagram and recorded the breaking fracture load. The fracture loads were recorded for comparison among the groups and subjected to statistical analysis (two-way ANOVA and Kolmogorov-Smirnov).

RESULTS

The mean fracture load of zirconia custom abutments across the groups (A1 to B2) ranged from 432 ± 97 N to 746 ± 275 N. The angulated zirconia custom abutment exhibited the highest fracture load, which was statistically significant (p = 0.045). The thickness of the zirconia custom abutment also had a positive influence on the strength of the specimens (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the 15° angulated zirconia custom abutments showed the highest fracture load of those investigated. The 1 mm thick zirconia custom abutments also exhibited significantly higher fracture load compared to 0.7 mm abutments.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The results of this in vitro study will help dental practitioners with their decision-making process in selecting the type of custom abutment to be used clinically.

摘要

目的

本体外研究第二部分的目的是比较不同厚度和角度的两件式氧化锆定制基台的断裂载荷。

材料与方法

40个氧化锆定制基台分为四组如下:A1组:厚度0.7mm,角度0°;A2组:厚度0.7mm,角度15°;B1组:厚度1mm,角度0°;B2组:厚度1mm,角度15°。与第一部分一样,在所有组中,将种植体复制体安装在自凝丙烯酸夹具中以支撑基台。使用手动扭矩扳手将氧化锆定制基台与种植体复制体连接。所有夹具均固定并安装在金属虎钳中,并使用万能试验机施加剪切应力直至破坏,十字头速度为0.5mm/min,力传递至氧化锆定制基台切缘下方2mm处的舌侧表面。本研究中使用的测试样本不包括牙冠。万能试验机通过计算机软件系统控制,该系统还完成应力-应变图并记录断裂载荷。记录断裂载荷以进行组间比较并进行统计分析(双向方差分析和柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验)。

结果

各组(A1至B2)氧化锆定制基台的平均断裂载荷范围为432±97N至746±275N。有角度的氧化锆定制基台表现出最高的断裂载荷,具有统计学意义(p = 0.045)。氧化锆定制基台的厚度对样本强度也有积极影响(p = 0.005)。

结论

在本研究中,15°有角度的氧化锆定制基台在所研究的基台中显示出最高的断裂载荷。与0.7mm厚的基台相比,1mm厚的氧化锆定制基台也表现出明显更高的断裂载荷。

临床意义

本体外研究的结果将有助于牙科医生在临床选择使用的定制基台类型时进行决策。

相似文献

1
An In Vitro Comparison of Fracture Load of Zirconia Custom Abutments with Internal Connection and Different Angulations and Thicknesses: Part II.具有内连接、不同角度和厚度的氧化锆定制基台断裂载荷的体外比较:第二部分。
J Prosthodont. 2016 Feb;25(2):151-5. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12292. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
2
An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thickness: part I.具有不同角度和厚度的内连接氧化锆定制基台骨折负荷的体外比较:第一部分。
J Prosthodont. 2014 Jun;23(4):296-301. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12118. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
3
Influence of Screw Channel Angulation on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments: An In Vitro Study.螺钉通道角度对氧化锆基台抗折性的影响:一项体外研究
J Prosthodont. 2021 Apr;30(4):329-334. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13275. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Influence of implant angulation on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.种植体角度对氧化锆基台抗折性的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2015 Feb;24(2):127-35. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12182. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
5
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.老化后支持全瓷冠的氧化锆和钛种植体基台的弯矩
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/clr.12192. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
6
In vitro fatigue and fracture resistance of one- and two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.单件式和两件式计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造氧化锆种植体基台的体外疲劳和抗断裂性能
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):546-54. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3942.
7
In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.体外研究连接类型对内连接和外连接氧化锆基台的骨折负荷的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):850-8.
8
In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.体外静态负荷下三种氧化锆种植体基台的评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Apr;109(4):255-63. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60054-2.
9
Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.种植体基台角度对覆盖式 CAM 铣削氧化锆单冠抗折强度的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2011 Jun;56(2):132-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01314.x.
10
Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.钛和氧化锆基台的抗折能力:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):304-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60306-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of screw channel angulation on the fracture resistance of one-piece zirconia crown with titanium base.螺钉通道角度对钛基一体式氧化锆全冠抗折性能的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Feb;34(2):167-173. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13806. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
Implant angulation and fracture resistance of one-piece screw-retained hybrid monolithic zirconia ceramic restorations.一体式螺钉固位混合式整体氧化锆陶瓷修复体的种植体角度和抗折强度。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0280816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280816. eCollection 2023.
3
Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes of Angled Screw Channel Implant Prostheses: A Systematic Review.
角形螺钉通道种植体修复体的临床和实验室结果:一项系统评价
Eur J Dent. 2022 Jul;16(3):488-499. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740298. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
4
Effect of Implant Platform Connection and Abutment Material on Removal Torque and Implant Hexagon Plastic Deformation.种植体平台连接和基台材料对拆除扭矩及种植体六角形塑性变形的影响
Eur J Dent. 2019 Jul;13(3):349-353. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700662. Epub 2019 Dec 3.