Holton N E, Bonner L L, Scott J E, Marshall S D, Franciscus R G, Southard T E
Department of Orthodontics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Anthropology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Anat. 2015 Jun;226(6):549-59. doi: 10.1111/joa.12307. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
The presence of a prominent chin in modern humans has been viewed by some researchers as an architectural adaptation to buttress the anterior corpus from bending stresses during mastication. In contrast, ontogenetic studies of mandibular symphyseal form suggest that a prominent chin results from the complex spatial interaction between the symphysis and surrounding soft tissue and skeletal anatomy during development. While variation in chin prominence is clearly influenced by differential growth and spatial constraints, it is unclear to what degree these developmental dynamics influence the mechanical properties of the symphysis. That is, do ontogenetic changes in symphyseal shape result in increased symphyseal bending resistance? We examined ontogenetic changes in the mechanical properties and shape of the symphysis using subjects from a longitudinal cephalometric growth study with ages ranging from 3 to 20+ years. We first examined whether ontogenetic changes in symphyseal shape were correlated with symphyseal vertical bending and wishboning resistance using multivariate regression. Secondly, we examined ontogenetic scaling of bending resistance relative to bending moment arm lengths. An ontogenetic increase in chin prominence was associated with decreased vertical bending resistance, while wishboning resistance was uncorrelated with ontogenetic development of the chin. Relative to bending moment arm lengths, vertical bending resistance scaled with significant negative allometry whereas wishboning resistance scaled isometrically. These results suggest a complex interaction between symphyseal ontogeny and bending resistance, and indicate that ontogenetic increases in chin projection do not provide greater bending resistance to the mandibular symphysis.
一些研究人员认为,现代人类突出的下巴是一种结构适应性特征,可在咀嚼过程中支撑下颌体前部免受弯曲应力的影响。相比之下,下颌联合形态的个体发育研究表明,突出的下巴是发育过程中联合处与周围软组织及骨骼解剖结构之间复杂空间相互作用的结果。虽然下巴突出程度的差异显然受到不同生长和空间限制的影响,但尚不清楚这些发育动态在多大程度上影响联合处的力学性能。也就是说,联合处形状的个体发育变化是否会导致联合处抗弯曲能力增强?我们使用了一项纵向头影测量生长研究中的受试者,年龄范围从3岁到20多岁,来研究联合处力学性能和形状的个体发育变化。我们首先使用多元回归检验联合处形状的个体发育变化是否与联合处垂直弯曲和叉状变形抗力相关。其次,我们研究了抗弯曲能力相对于弯曲力臂长度的个体发育缩放情况。下巴突出程度的个体发育增加与垂直弯曲抗力降低相关,而叉状变形抗力与下巴的个体发育无关。相对于弯曲力臂长度,垂直弯曲抗力呈显著负异速生长缩放,而叉状变形抗力呈等速生长缩放。这些结果表明联合处个体发育与抗弯曲能力之间存在复杂的相互作用,并表明下巴突出的个体发育增加并不会为下颌联合处提供更大的抗弯曲能力。