• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“皮肤切开”时间并不能很好地反映心脏手术中手术室的利用情况和效率。

"Knife to skin" time is a poor marker of operating room utilization and efficiency in cardiac surgery.

作者信息

Luthra Suvitesh, Ramady Omar, Monge Mary, Fitzsimons Michael G, Kaleta Terry R, Sundt Thoralf M

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Cardiac Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2015 Jun;30(6):477-87. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12528. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1111/jocs.12528
PMID:25868385
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Markers of operation room (OR) efficiency in cardiac surgery are focused on "knife to skin" and "start time tardiness." These do not evaluate the middle and later parts of the cardiac surgical pathway. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate knife to skin time as an efficiency marker in cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We looked at knife to skin time, procedure time, and transfer times in the cardiac operational pathway for their correlation with predefined indices of operational efficiency (Index of Operation Efficiency - InOE, Surgical Index of Operational Efficiency - sInOE). A regression analysis was performed to test the goodness of fit of the regression curves estimated for InOE relative to the times on the operational pathway.

RESULTS

The mean knife to skin time was 90.6 ± 13 minutes (23% of total OR time). The mean procedure time was 282 ± 123 minutes (71% of total OR time). Utilization efficiencies were highest for aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting and least for complex aortic procedures. There were no significant procedure-specific or team-specific differences for standard procedures. Procedure times correlated the strongest with InOE (r = -0.98, p < 0.01). Compared to procedure times, knife to skin is not as strong an indicator of efficiency. A statistically significant linear dependence on InOE was observed with "procedure times" only.

CONCLUSIONS

Procedure times are a better marker of OR efficiency than knife to skin in cardiac cases. Strategies to increase OR utilization and efficiency should address procedure times in addition to knife to skin times.

摘要

背景

心脏手术中手术室(OR)效率的指标主要集中在“切皮时间”和“开始时间延迟”。这些指标并未评估心脏手术流程的中后段。本分析的目的是评估切皮时间作为心脏手术效率指标的情况。

方法

我们研究了心脏手术流程中的切皮时间、手术时间和转运时间,以确定它们与预先定义的手术效率指标(手术效率指数 - InOE、手术操作效率外科指数 - sInOE)之间的相关性。进行回归分析以检验针对InOE估计的回归曲线与手术流程时间的拟合优度。

结果

平均切皮时间为90.6±13分钟(占手术室总时间的23%)。平均手术时间为282±123分钟(占手术室总时间的71%)。主动脉瓣置换术和冠状动脉搭桥术的利用效率最高,复杂主动脉手术的利用效率最低。标准手术在手术特定或团队特定方面没有显著差异。手术时间与InOE的相关性最强(r = -0.98,p < 0.01)。与手术时间相比,切皮时间作为效率指标的关联性没那么强。仅观察到“手术时间”与InOE存在统计学上显著的线性相关性。

结论

在心脏手术病例中,手术时间比切皮时间更能作为手术室效率的指标。提高手术室利用率和效率的策略除了关注切皮时间外,还应关注手术时间。

相似文献

1
"Knife to skin" time is a poor marker of operating room utilization and efficiency in cardiac surgery.“皮肤切开”时间并不能很好地反映心脏手术中手术室的利用情况和效率。
J Card Surg. 2015 Jun;30(6):477-87. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12528. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
2
Modeling procedure and surgical times for current procedural terminology-anesthesia-surgeon combinations and evaluation in terms of case-duration prediction and operating room efficiency: a multicenter study.当前程序术语-麻醉-外科医生组合的建模程序和手术时间以及在病例持续时间预测和手术室效率方面的评估:一项多中心研究
Anesth Analg. 2009 Oct;109(4):1232-45. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b5de07.
3
Analysis of efficiency of common otolaryngology operations: comparison of operating room vs short procedure room in a pediatric tertiary hospital.儿童三级医院常见耳鼻喉科手术效率分析:手术室与短程序室的比较
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Apr;129(4):435-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.4.435.
4
Auditing of operating room times: a quality improvement project.手术室时间审计:一项质量改进项目。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;78(5):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
5
Criteria for assessing operating room utilization in a free-standing children's hospital.评估独立儿童医院手术室利用率的标准。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Jul;22(7):696-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03690.x. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
6
The efficiency of a dedicated staff on operating room turnover time in hand surgery.专业人员配备对手部手术中手术室周转时间的影响
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jan;39(1):108-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.09.039. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
7
[Utilization rates and turnover times as indicators of OR workflow efficiency].[手术利用率和周转时间作为手术室工作流程效率的指标]
Anaesthesist. 2007 Oct;56(10):1060-6. doi: 10.1007/s00101-007-1236-3.
8
Analysis of the surgical activity in the Dermatology Department of Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, between 2005 and 2010: determination of the standard operating times.对西班牙马德里丰拉夫拉达大学医院皮肤科2005年至2010年手术活动的分析:确定标准手术时间。
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013 Mar;104(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
9
Analysis of Operating Room Efficiency in a Burn Center.烧伤中心手术室效率分析
J Burn Care Res. 2018 Jan 1;39(1):89-93. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000572.
10
Enhancement opportunities in operating room utilization; with a statistical appendix.手术室利用方面的改进机会;附统计附录。
J Surg Res. 2015 Mar;194(1):43-51.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.044. Epub 2014 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of anesthesia ready time: Analysis and benchmark data.麻醉准备时间的预测因素:分析与基准数据。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jul 6;15:446-453. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.06.016. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Getting operating theatre metrics right to underpin quality improvement: understanding limitations of NHS Model Hospital calculations.正确获取手术室指标以支持质量改进:了解 NHS 模型医院计算的局限性。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;131(1):130-134. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.03.032. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
On time surgery start: Is standardization the answer?
准时开始手术:标准化是答案吗?
J Card Surg. 2022 Oct;37(10):3099-3100. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16755. Epub 2022 Jul 17.