• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输血依赖型骨髓增生异常综合征中促红细胞生成素刺激剂给药方式的差异会影响疗效。

Variations in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent administration in transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes impact response.

作者信息

Duong Vu H, Baer Maria R, Hendrick Franklin, Weiss Sheila R, Sato Masayo, Zeidan Amer M, Gore Steven D, Davidoff Amy J

机构信息

University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Leuk Res. 2015 Jun;39(6):586-91. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2015.03.013
PMID:25869077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4441842/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in approximately 40% of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in clinical trials. We studied the association of timing of ESA initiation, agent (epoetin alfa, darbepoetin) and number of weeks of ESA use with response in MDS patients in routine practice.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with MDS from 2001 to 2005 were identified in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database. The study cohort consisted of patients with new-onset transfusion dependence (TD). All patients received an ESA at least once during the study period, which began the week that criteria for TD were met and continued until transfusion independence (TI). Kaplan-Meier statistics and Cox Proportional Hazard models were used to assess relationships between time to ESA initiation, agent and number of weeks of ESA use and TI attainment.

RESULTS

Of 610 TD patients treated with ESAs, 210 (34.4%) achieved TI. Median time from ESA initiation to TI was 13 weeks. Shorter time from TD to ESA initiation and use of darbepoetin were associated with higher probability of achieving TI. The probability of achieving TI decreased beyond 8 weeks of treatment, and was very low beyond 16 weeks (8-15 weeks: HR=0.64, 16-31 weeks: HR=0.25, 32+ weeks HR=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational, population-based study, variations in ESA administration impacted response in transfusion-dependent MDS patients, with higher response rates with early administration and use of darbepoetin, and low response likelihood in non-responders beyond 16 weeks of therapy.

摘要

引言

在临床试验中,促红细胞生成素(ESAs)可使约40%的骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者减少红细胞(RBC)输血。我们在常规实践中研究了MDS患者开始使用ESA的时间、药物(促红细胞生成素α、达比泊汀)以及使用ESA的周数与反应之间的关联。

方法

在监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险链接数据库中识别出2001年至2005年诊断为MDS的患者。研究队列包括新发性输血依赖(TD)患者。所有患者在研究期间至少接受过一次ESA治疗,研究从满足TD标准的那一周开始,持续至输血独立(TI)。使用Kaplan-Meier统计和Cox比例风险模型评估开始使用ESA的时间、药物以及使用ESA的周数与实现TI之间的关系。

结果

在610例接受ESA治疗的TD患者中,210例(34.4%)实现了TI。从开始使用ESA到TI的中位时间为13周。从TD到开始使用ESA的时间较短以及使用达比泊汀与实现TI的较高概率相关。治疗超过8周后实现TI的概率降低,超过16周时非常低(8 - 15周:风险比[HR]=0.64,16 - 31周:HR=0.25,32周及以上:HR=0.10)。

结论

在这项基于人群的观察性研究中,ESA给药的差异影响了输血依赖型MDS患者的反应,早期给药和使用达比泊汀的反应率较高,治疗16周后无反应者的反应可能性较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0add/4441842/5e12962505f3/nihms680479f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0add/4441842/025ef9f9823e/nihms680479f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0add/4441842/0c72cfae16eb/nihms680479f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0add/4441842/d383723cc439/nihms680479f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0add/4441842/5e12962505f3/nihms680479f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0add/4441842/025ef9f9823e/nihms680479f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0add/4441842/0c72cfae16eb/nihms680479f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0add/4441842/d383723cc439/nihms680479f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0add/4441842/5e12962505f3/nihms680479f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Variations in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent administration in transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes impact response.输血依赖型骨髓增生异常综合征中促红细胞生成素刺激剂给药方式的差异会影响疗效。
Leuk Res. 2015 Jun;39(6):586-91. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
2
Phase 2, single-arm trial to evaluate the effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa for correcting anaemia in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.2期单臂试验,评估达贝泊汀α纠正骨髓增生异常综合征患者贫血的有效性。
Br J Haematol. 2008 Jul;142(3):379-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07181.x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
3
Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents among chemotherapy patients with hemoglobin exceeding 12 grams per deciliter.血红蛋白超过每分升12克的化疗患者中促红细胞生成素的使用情况。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(9):858-69. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.9.858.
4
Dose efficiency of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the treatment of patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: a systematic review.促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗化疗所致贫血患者的剂量效率:一项系统评价
Clin Ther. 2014 Apr 1;36(4):594-610. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
5
Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.在接受促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗的、输血依赖的、低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者中,luspatercept 对比 epoetin alfa 的疗效和安全性(COMMANDS):一项 3 期、开放标签、随机对照临床试验的中期分析。
Lancet. 2023 Jul 29;402(10399):373-385. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00874-7. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
6
Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.芦可替尼与红细胞生成刺激剂治疗初治、依赖输血的低危骨髓增生异常综合征(COMMANDES):一项 3 期、开放标签、随机、对照临床试验的主要分析。
Lancet Haematol. 2024 Sep;11(9):e646-e658. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00203-5. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
7
A retrospective cohort study to assess the impact of therapeutic substitution of darbepoetin alfa for epoetin alfa in anemic patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.一项回顾性队列研究,旨在评估在骨髓增生异常综合征贫血患者中用达贝泊汀α替代依泊汀α进行治疗的影响。
J Support Oncol. 2005 Nov-Dec;3(6):419-26.
8
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis.促红细胞生成素用于治疗成人慢性肾脏病贫血:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 8;2014(12):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub2.
9
Empirical methods to calculate an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose conversion ratio in nondialyzed patients with chronic kidney disease.计算非透析慢性肾病患者促红细胞生成素剂量转换率的经验方法。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Nov-Dec;15(9):741-50. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.9.741.
10
Experience with luspatercept therapy in patients with transfusion-dependent low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in real-world clinical practice: exploring the positive effect of combination with erythropoietin alfa.卢司帕西普治疗输血依赖型低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者在真实世界临床实践中的经验:探索与阿法依泊汀联合使用的积极效果。
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 2;14:1398331. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1398331. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Efficacy of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Patients with Low-Risk or Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Multicenter Real-Life Data.低危或中危-1 风险骨髓增生异常综合征患者使用红细胞生成刺激剂的长期疗效:多中心真实世界数据。
Turk J Haematol. 2023 May 29;40(2):92-100. doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2023.2022.0437. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
The Clinical Efficacy of Epoetin Alfa and Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients with Low-Risk or Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Retrospective Multi-center Real-Life Study.阿法依泊汀和阿法达贝泊汀治疗低危或中危-1骨髓增生异常综合征患者的临床疗效:回顾性多中心真实世界研究
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2022 Apr;38(2):299-308. doi: 10.1007/s12288-021-01458-1. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent policy decisions on off-label use in myelodysplastic syndromes.促红细胞生成素刺激剂政策决策对骨髓增生异常综合征中药物标签外使用的影响。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Nov 26;4(4). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.004.04.a02. eCollection 2014.
2
Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet.成人原发性骨髓增生异常综合征的诊断和治疗:欧洲白血病网络的建议。
Blood. 2013 Oct 24;122(17):2943-64. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-492884. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
3
Patterns of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use among Medicare beneficiaries with myelodysplastic syndromes and consistency with clinical guidelines.
Management of the Older Patient with Myelodysplastic Syndrome.老年骨髓增生异常综合征患者的管理。
Drugs Aging. 2021 Sep;38(9):751-767. doi: 10.1007/s40266-021-00881-3. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
Clinical Management of Anemia in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: An Update on Emerging Therapeutic Options.骨髓增生异常综合征患者贫血的临床管理:新兴治疗选择的最新进展
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Jan 25;13:645-657. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S240600. eCollection 2021.
5
Treatment of Anemia in Transfusion-Dependent and Non-Transfusion-Dependent Lower-Risk MDS: Current and Emerging Strategies.输血依赖型和非输血依赖型低危骨髓增生异常综合征贫血的治疗:当前及新出现的策略
Hemasphere. 2019 Oct 30;3(6):e314. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000314. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Management of anemia in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents newer and older agents.低危骨髓增生异常综合征应用促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗的贫血管理:新旧药物的比较。
Med Oncol. 2018 Apr 19;35(5):76. doi: 10.1007/s12032-018-1135-2.
医保受益人群中骨髓增生异常综合征患者促红细胞生成素刺激剂的使用模式及其与临床指南的一致性。
Leuk Res. 2013 Jun;37(6):675-80. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.02.021. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
4
Combined treatment with lenalidomide and epoetin alfa in lower-risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.来那度胺联合促红细胞生成素α治疗低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者。
Blood. 2012 Oct 25;120(17):3419-24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-415661. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
5
Does addition of erythropoiesis stimulating agents improve the outcome of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine?促红细胞生成素刺激剂的添加是否能改善用阿扎胞苷治疗的高危骨髓增生异常综合征的结局?
Leuk Res. 2012 Apr;36(4):397-400. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.11.019. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
6
Hematopoietic growth factors in myelodysplastic syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征中的造血生长因子。
Semin Oncol. 2011 Oct;38(5):635-47. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.04.014.
7
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: myelodysplastic syndromes.NCCN 临床肿瘤学实践指南:骨髓增生异常综合征。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011 Jan;9(1):30-56. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0005.
8
Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome patients with erythropoietin with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: results of a prospective randomized phase 3 trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1996).采用促红细胞生成素联合或不联合粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗骨髓增生异常综合征患者:东部肿瘤协作组(E1996)一项前瞻性随机3期试验的结果
Blood. 2009 Sep 17;114(12):2393-400. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-211797. Epub 2009 Jun 29.
9
A Phase II intra-patient dose-escalation trial of weight-based darbepoetin alfa with or without granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in myelodysplastic syndromes.一项针对骨髓增生异常综合征患者的II期剂量递增试验,该试验基于体重使用或不使用粒细胞集落刺激因子的情况下给予达贝泊汀α。
Am J Hematol. 2009 Jan;84(1):15-20. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21316.
10
Characteristics of US patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of six cross-sectional physician surveys.美国骨髓增生异常综合征患者的特征:六项横断面医师调查结果
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Nov 5;100(21):1542-51. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn349. Epub 2008 Oct 28.