• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低危或中危-1 风险骨髓增生异常综合征患者使用红细胞生成刺激剂的长期疗效:多中心真实世界数据。

Long-Term Efficacy of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Patients with Low-Risk or Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Multicenter Real-Life Data.

机构信息

Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Zonguldak, Türkiye

Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Kocaeli, Türkiye

出版信息

Turk J Haematol. 2023 May 29;40(2):92-100. doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2023.2022.0437. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

DOI:10.4274/tjh.galenos.2023.2022.0437
PMID:36799095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10240155/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in a real-life setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 204 patients with low-risk or intermediate-1-risk MDS who received epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa were included. Hemoglobin levels and transfusion needs were recorded before treatment and at 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and 48 months of treatment.

RESULTS

At the 36-month (p=0.025) and 48-month (p=0.022) visits, epoetin alfa yielded significantly higher hemoglobin levels compared to darbepoetin alfa. Transfusion needs were also significantly lower with epoetin alfa compared to darbepoetin alfa at 24 months (p=0.012) and in the low-risk group compared to the intermediate-risk group at 24 months (p=0.018), 36 months (p=0.025), and 48 months (p<0.001). Treatment response rates at the 24-month, 36-month, and 48-month visits in the epoetin alfa (43.0%, 33.6%, and 27.1%), darbepoetin alfa (29.9%, 22.7%, and 16.5%), low-risk (39.3%, 30.0%, and 26.0%), and intermediate-risk (29.6%, 24.1%, and 11.1%) groups were lower than those obtained at 12 months, and the values differed significantly for the 36-month and 48-month visits with values ranging from p<0.05 to p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

This real-life long-term ESA extension study investigated the clinical efficacy of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa for up to 48 months, revealing that treatment efficacy reached a plateau starting from the 24 month of therapy with a continuing decrease in treatment response rates regardless of treatment type, risk status, or gender. Nonetheless, significantly higher hemoglobin levels and marked improvement in transfusion needs were evident in epoetin-treated patients compared to darbepoetin-treated patients and in the low-risk group compared to the intermediate-risk group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估促红细胞生成素阿尔法和达贝泊汀阿尔法在骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者真实环境中的长期临床疗效。

材料与方法

共纳入 204 例低危或中危-1 级 MDS 患者,接受促红细胞生成素阿尔法或达贝泊汀阿尔法治疗。记录治疗前及治疗 12、24、36、48 个月时的血红蛋白水平和输血需求。

结果

36 个月时(p=0.025)和 48 个月时(p=0.022),促红细胞生成素阿尔法治疗组的血红蛋白水平明显高于达贝泊汀阿尔法治疗组。与达贝泊汀阿尔法治疗组相比,促红细胞生成素阿尔法治疗组在 24 个月时(p=0.012)和低危组在 24、36 和 48 个月时(p=0.018、p=0.025 和 p<0.001)的输血需求也明显降低。24、36 和 48 个月时的治疗反应率在促红细胞生成素阿尔法(43.0%、33.6%和 27.1%)、达贝泊汀阿尔法(29.9%、22.7%和 16.5%)、低危(39.3%、30.0%和 26.0%)和中危(29.6%、24.1%和 11.1%)组均低于 12 个月时,且在 36 和 48 个月时的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05 至 p<0.001)。

结论

本真实世界长期 ESA 扩展研究调查了促红细胞生成素阿尔法和达贝泊汀阿尔法长达 48 个月的临床疗效,结果表明,治疗疗效从治疗 24 个月开始达到平台期,治疗反应率持续下降,无论治疗类型、风险状况或性别如何。然而,与达贝泊汀阿尔法治疗组和中危组相比,促红细胞生成素阿尔法治疗组的血红蛋白水平显著升高,输血需求明显改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/10240155/b9fbf21bc545/TJH-40-92-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/10240155/b9fbf21bc545/TJH-40-92-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46db/10240155/b9fbf21bc545/TJH-40-92-g6.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Efficacy of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Patients with Low-Risk or Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Multicenter Real-Life Data.低危或中危-1 风险骨髓增生异常综合征患者使用红细胞生成刺激剂的长期疗效:多中心真实世界数据。
Turk J Haematol. 2023 May 29;40(2):92-100. doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2023.2022.0437. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
Long-Term Transfusion Independence with Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the COMMANDS Trial.在COMMANDS试验中,对于未使用过促红细胞生成素、低风险的骨髓增生异常综合征患者,卢司帕西普与阿法依泊汀实现长期输血独立的比较
Adv Ther. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03208-5.
3
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes: a meta-analysis.促红细胞生成素治疗骨髓增生异常综合征贫血的荟萃分析
Ann Hematol. 2008 Jul;87(7):527-36. doi: 10.1007/s00277-008-0450-7. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
4
Continuous erythropoiesis receptor activator (CERA) for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease.用于治疗慢性肾脏病贫血的持续促红细胞生成素受体激活剂(CERA)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 7;8(8):CD009904. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009904.pub2.
5
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis.促红细胞生成素用于治疗成人慢性肾脏病贫血:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 8;2014(12):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub2.
6
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis.促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗慢性肾脏病成人贫血的网状 Meta 分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 13;2(2):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub3.
7
Darbepoetin for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease.达贝泊汀用于治疗慢性肾脏病贫血
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 31;2014(3):CD009297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009297.pub2.
8
Dose efficiency of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the treatment of patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: a systematic review.促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗化疗所致贫血患者的剂量效率:一项系统评价
Clin Ther. 2014 Apr 1;36(4):594-610. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
9
Mortality risk of darbepoetin alfa versus epoetin alfa in patients with CKD: systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性肾脏病患者中,达比加群酯与依泊汀α的死亡风险比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jul;66(1):69-74. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment.促红细胞生成素α、促红细胞生成素β和达比加群酯治疗癌症相关性贫血(尤其是癌症治疗所致贫血)的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(13):1-202, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11130.

本文引用的文献

1
The Clinical Efficacy of Epoetin Alfa and Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients with Low-Risk or Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Retrospective Multi-center Real-Life Study.阿法依泊汀和阿法达贝泊汀治疗低危或中危-1骨髓增生异常综合征患者的临床疗效:回顾性多中心真实世界研究
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2022 Apr;38(2):299-308. doi: 10.1007/s12288-021-01458-1. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
2
Therapy for lower-risk MDS.低危 MDS 的治疗。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020 Dec 4;2020(1):426-433. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2020000127.
3
Prolonged response to recombinant human erythropoietin treatment in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome at a single referral centre in Brazil.
巴西某转诊中心的骨髓增生异常综合征患者接受重组人红细胞生成素治疗后的长期应答。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019;74:e771. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e771. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
4
Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents and Cancer: Myth or Truth.促红细胞生成素与癌症:神话还是真相。
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2019 Jul;26(4):221-224. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2019.04.001.
5
Epoetin alfa for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome-related anemia: A review of clinical data, clinical guidelines, and treatment protocols.促红细胞生成素阿尔法治疗骨髓增生异常综合征相关贫血:临床数据、临床指南和治疗方案的综述。
Leuk Res. 2019 Jun;81:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
6
Clinical effectiveness and safety of erythropoietin-stimulating agents for the treatment of low- and intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a systematic literature review.促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗低危和中危-1 风险骨髓增生异常综合征的临床疗效和安全性:系统文献评价。
Br J Haematol. 2019 Jan;184(2):134-160. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15707. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Proposals for revised IWG 2018 hematological response criteria in patients with MDS included in clinical trials.临床试验中修订 MDS 患者 IWG 2018 血液学反应标准的建议。
Blood. 2019 Mar 7;133(10):1020-1030. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-06-857102. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
8
Part 3: Myelodysplastic syndromes-Treatment of low-risk patients without the 5q deletion.第3部分:骨髓增生异常综合征——无5q缺失的低危患者的治疗
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2018 Jul-Sep;40(3):267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
9
A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of epoetin-α in anemic patients with low-risk MDS.一项评估低危 MDS 贫血患者使用促红细胞生成素-α的疗效和安全性的 3 期随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Leukemia. 2018 Dec;32(12):2648-2658. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0118-9. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
10
A predictive model of response to erythropoietin stimulating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome: from the Canadian MDS patient registry.骨髓增生异常综合征中对促红细胞生成素刺激剂反应的预测模型:来自加拿大骨髓增生异常综合征患者登记处
Ann Hematol. 2017 Dec;96(12):2025-2029. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3137-0. Epub 2017 Oct 3.