Institute of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria.
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Aug;12(8):1717-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent comorbidity in patients with pacemaker and is a recognized cause of mortality, morbidity, and quality-of-life impairment. The international MINimizE Right Ventricular pacing to prevent Atrial fibrillation and heart failure trial established that atrial preventive pacing and atrial antitachycardia pacing (DDDRP) in combination with managed ventricular pacing (MVP) reduce permanent AF occurrence in comparison with standard dual-chamber pacing (DDDR).
We aimed to determine the role of new-generation atrial antitachycardia pacing (Reactive ATP) in preventing AF disease progression.
Patients with dual-chamber pacemaker and with previous atrial tachyarrhythmias were randomly assigned to DDDR (n = 385 (33%)), MVP (n = 398 (34%)), or DDDRP+MVP (n = 383 (33%)) group. The incidence of permanent AF, as defined by the study investigator, or persistent AF, defined as ≥7 consecutive days with AF, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, while its association with patients' characteristics was evaluated via multivariable Cox regression.
At 2 years, the incidence of permanent or persistent AF was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22%-31%) in the DDDR group, 25% (95% CI 21%-30%) in the MVP group, and 15% (95% CI 12%-20%) in the DDDRP+MVP group (P < .001 vs. DDDR; P = .002 vs. MVP). Generalized estimating equation-adjusted Reactive ATP efficacy was 44.4% (95% CI 41.3%-47.6%). Multivariate modeling identified high Reactive ATP efficacy (>44.4%) as a significant predictor of reduced permanent or persistent AF risk (hazard ratio 0.32; 95% CI 0.13-0.781; P = .012) and episodes' characteristics, such as long atrial arrhythmia cycle length, regularity, and the number of rhythm transitions, as predictors of high ATP efficacy.
In patients with bradycardia, DDDRP+MVP delays AF disease progression, with Reactive ATP efficacy being an independent predictor of permanent or persistent AF reduction.
心房颤动(AF)是起搏器患者的常见合并症,是死亡率、发病率和生活质量受损的公认原因。MINimizE 右心室起搏以预防心房颤动和心力衰竭的国际试验证实,与标准双腔起搏(DDDR)相比,预防性心房起搏和心房抗心动过速起搏(DDDRP)联合管理性心室起搏(MVP)可降低永久性 AF 的发生。
我们旨在确定新一代心房抗心动过速起搏(Reactive ATP)在预防 AF 疾病进展中的作用。
将双腔起搏器和先前有房性心动过速的患者随机分配到 DDDR(n = 385(33%))、MVP(n = 398(34%))或 DDDRP+MVP(n = 383(33%))组。由研究人员定义的永久性 AF 的发生率,或持续性 AF,定义为 AF 持续≥7 天,使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计,而通过多变量 Cox 回归评估其与患者特征的相关性。
在 2 年时,DDDR 组永久性或持续性 AF 的发生率为 26%(95%CI 22%-31%),MVP 组为 25%(95%CI 21%-30%),DDDRP+MVP 组为 15%(95%CI 12%-20%)(P<.001 与 DDDR;P =.002 与 MVP)。广义估计方程调整后的 Reactive ATP 疗效为 44.4%(95%CI 41.3%-47.6%)。多变量模型确定高 Reactive ATP 疗效(>44.4%)是降低永久性或持续性 AF 风险的显著预测因子(风险比 0.32;95%CI 0.13-0.781;P =.012)和发作特征,如长心房心律失常周期长度、规律性和节律转换次数,是高 ATP 疗效的预测因子。
在心动过缓患者中,DDDRP+MVP 可延迟 AF 疾病进展,Reactive ATP 疗效是永久性或持续性 AF 减少的独立预测因子。