Catalano O A, Nicolai E, Rosen B R, Luongo A, Catalano M, Iannace C, Guimaraes A, Vangel M G, Mahmood U, Soricelli A, Salvatore M
Department of Radiology, University of Naples Parthenope -SDN IRCCS, Via F. Acton 38, Napoli, Na 80143, Italy.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, SDN IRCCS, Via Gianturco 113, Napoli, Na 80143, Italy.
Br J Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;112(9):1452-60. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.112. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
Despite improvements in treatments, metastatic breast cancer remains difficult to cure. Bones constitute the most common site of first-time recurrence, occurring in 40-75% of cases. Therefore, evaluation for possible osseous metastases is crucial. Technetium 99 ((99)Tc) bone scintigraphy and fluorodexossyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (PET-CT) are the most commonly used techniques to assess osseous metastasis. PET magnetic resonance (PET-MR) imaging is an innovative technique still under investigation. We compared the capability of PET-MR to that of same-day PET-CT to assess osseous metastases in patients with breast cancer.
One hundred and nine patients with breast cancer, who underwent same-day contrast enhanced (CE)-PET-CT and CE-PET-MR, were evaluated. CE-PET-CT and CE-PET-MR studies were interpreted by consensus by a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician. Correlations with prior imaging and follow-up studies were used as the reference standard. Binomial confidence intervals and a χ(2) test were used for categorical data, and paired t-test was used for the SUVmax data; a non-informative prior Bayesian approach was used to estimate and compare the specificities.
Osseous metastases affected 25 out 109 patients. Metastases were demonstrated by CE-PET-CT in 22 out of 25 patients (88%±7%), and by CE-PET-MR in 25 out of 25 patients (100%). CE-PET-CT revealed 90 osseous metastases and CE-PET-MR revealed 141 osseous metastases (P<0.001). The estimated sensitivity of CE-PET-CT and CE-PET-MR were 0.8519 and 0.9630, respectively. The estimated specificity for CE-FDG-PET-MR was 0.9884. The specificity of CE-PET-CT cannot be determined from patient-level data, because CE-PET-CT yielded a false-positive lesion in a patient who also had other, true metastases.
CE-PET-MR detected a higher number of osseous metastases than did same-day CE-PET-CT, and was positive for 12% of the patients deemed osseous metastasis-negative on the basis of CE-PET-CT.
尽管治疗方法有所改进,但转移性乳腺癌仍然难以治愈。骨是首次复发最常见的部位,40% - 75%的病例会出现这种情况。因此,评估是否存在骨转移至关重要。锝99((99)Tc)骨闪烁显像和氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)是评估骨转移最常用的技术。PET磁共振(PET-MR)成像仍是一项正在研究的创新技术。我们比较了PET-MR与同日PET-CT评估乳腺癌患者骨转移的能力。
对109例接受同日对比增强(CE)-PET-CT和CE-PET-MR检查的乳腺癌患者进行评估。CE-PET-CT和CE-PET-MR检查结果由一名放射科医生和一名核医学医生共同解读。与先前的影像学检查和随访研究的相关性用作参考标准。分类数据采用二项式置信区间和χ²检验,SUVmax数据采用配对t检验;采用无信息先验贝叶斯方法估计和比较特异性。
109例患者中有25例发生骨转移。25例患者中,CE-PET-CT显示22例有转移(88%±7%),CE-PET-MR显示25例均有转移(100%)。CE-PET-CT发现90处骨转移,CE-PET-MR发现141处骨转移(P<0.001)。CE-PET-CT和CE-PET-MR的估计敏感性分别为0.8519和0.9630。CE-FDG-PET-MR的估计特异性为0.9884。由于CE-PET-CT在一名同时患有其他真正转移灶的患者中产生了假阳性病变,因此无法从患者层面的数据确定CE-PET-CT的特异性。
CE-PET-MR检测到的骨转移数量比同日CE-PET-CT更多,并且对于基于CE-PET-CT被判定为骨转移阴性的患者,有12%的患者经CE-PET-MR检测呈阳性。