• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ST段抬高型心肌梗死误诊患者的特征。

Characteristics of patients with false- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnoses.

作者信息

Groot Hilde E, Wieringa Wouter G, Mahmoud Karim D, Lexis Chris Ph, Hiemstra Bart, van der Harst Pim, Lipsic Erik

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016 Aug;5(4):339-46. doi: 10.1177/2048872615581500. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1177/2048872615581500
PMID:25872973
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A subgroup of patients presenting with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have no culprit lesion during coronary angiography (false-positive STEMI). Little is known about patient- and system-related factors that are associated with false-positive STEMI. We evaluated the incidence, correlates, delay, final diagnosis, and outcome of patients with false-positive STEMI.

METHODS

We studied 827 consecutive patients presenting with suspected STEMI between January 2011-September 2012.

RESULTS

A false positive STEMI activation was identified in 68 patients (8.2%). Patients with false-positive STEMI were younger (57 vs 63 year; p=0.020), less often had hypercholesterolemia (19 vs 43%; p=0.001), and had a higher heart rate (82 vs 75 bpm; p=0.014). The association between these factors and false-positive STEMI activation persisted in multivariate analysis. The duration of symptoms to call was longer in false-positive STEMI patients (128 vs 83 min; p=0.030), although this did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis. Final diagnosis in patients with false-positive STEMI activation was particularly from unknown origin (41%). There were no significant differences in mortality at 30 days and one year between patients with STEMI and false-positive STEMI.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of false-positive STEMI was 8.2% in patients suspected of STEMI. Patients with false-positive STEMI differ from STEMI patients in certain baseline characteristics and in patient delay. Interestingly, absence of coronary disease did not translate into better clinical outcome.

摘要

背景

一部分表现为疑似ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的患者在冠状动脉造影时没有罪犯病变(假阳性STEMI)。关于与假阳性STEMI相关的患者及系统因素知之甚少。我们评估了假阳性STEMI患者的发生率、相关因素、延迟情况、最终诊断及预后。

方法

我们研究了2011年1月至2012年9月期间连续就诊的827例疑似STEMI患者。

结果

68例患者(8.2%)被确定为假阳性STEMI激活。假阳性STEMI患者更年轻(57岁对63岁;p=0.020),高胆固醇血症的发生率更低(19%对43%;p=0.001),心率更高(82次/分对75次/分;p=0.014)。在多变量分析中,这些因素与假阳性STEMI激活之间的关联仍然存在。假阳性STEMI患者从症状出现到呼叫的时间更长(128分钟对83分钟;p=0.030),尽管在多变量分析中这未达到统计学意义。假阳性STEMI激活患者的最终诊断尤其多为病因不明(41%)。STEMI患者与假阳性STEMI患者在30天和1年时的死亡率没有显著差异。

结论

疑似STEMI患者中假阳性STEMI的发生率为8.2%。假阳性STEMI患者在某些基线特征和患者延迟方面与STEMI患者不同。有趣的是,无冠状动脉疾病并未转化为更好的临床结局。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of patients with false- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnoses.ST段抬高型心肌梗死误诊患者的特征。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016 Aug;5(4):339-46. doi: 10.1177/2048872615581500. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
2
Effectiveness of a Prehospital Wireless 12-Lead Electrocardiogram and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activation for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.院前无线12导联心电图及心脏导管实验室激活对ST段抬高型心肌梗死的有效性。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 15;119(4):553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.10.042. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
Identifying false-positive ST-elevation myocardial infarction in emergency department patients.识别急诊科患者中的假阳性ST段抬高型心肌梗死。
J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;43(4):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.09.027. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
4
"False-positive" cardiac catheterization laboratory activation among patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.疑似ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中“假阳性”的心导管插入实验室激活情况。
JAMA. 2007 Dec 19;298(23):2754-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.23.2754.
5
Characteristics and prognosis in patients with false-positive ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the ED.急诊科 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死假阳性患者的特征和预后。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 May;31(5):825-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
6
Prevalence and factors associated with false-positive ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnoses at primary percutaneous coronary intervention–capable centers: a report from the Activate-SF registry.具备直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力的中心中,ST段抬高型心肌梗死假阳性诊断的患病率及相关因素:来自Activate-SF注册研究的报告
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jun 11;172(11):864-71. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.945.
7
False Positive STEMI Activations in a Regional Network: Comprehensive Analysis and Clinical Impact. Results From the Catalonian Codi Infart Network.区域网络中ST段抬高型心肌梗死的假阳性激活:综合分析与临床影响。加泰罗尼亚Codi Infart网络的结果
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Apr;71(4):243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
8
Accurate Prediction of False ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Ready for Prime Time?准确预测非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:是否已准备好进入黄金时期?
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2018 Oct;43(10):400-412. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
9
Editor's Choice-Is the pre-hospital ECG after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest accurate for the diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction?编辑推荐——院外心脏骤停后的院前心电图对ST段抬高型心肌梗死的诊断准确吗?
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016 Aug;5(4):317-26. doi: 10.1177/2048872615585519. Epub 2015 May 5.
10
Comprehensive analysis of intravascular ultrasound and angiographic morphology of culprit lesions between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死与非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征罪犯病变血管内超声及血管造影形态学的综合分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Feb 15;171(3):423-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.094. Epub 2014 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk score to predict false-positive ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis.预测急诊科假阳性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的风险评分:一项回顾性分析
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jun 30;25(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0408-7.