Telemedical Brain Computed Tomography Misinterpretation by Stroke Neurologists Is Not Associated with Thrombolysis-Related Intracranial Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND

The Stroke Eastern Saxony Network (SOS-NET) provides telecare for acute stroke patients. Stroke neurologists recommend intravenous thrombolysis based on clinical assessment and cerebral computed tomography (CT) evaluation using Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS). We sought to assess whether ASPECTS misinterpretation by stroke neurologists was associated with thrombolysis-related symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive SOS-NET patients treated with thrombolytics from July 2007 to July 2012. Experienced neuroradiologists re-evaluated CT scans blinded to clinical information providing reference standard. We defined ASPECTS underestimation as ASPECTS stroke neurologist--ASPECTS neuroradiologist more than 1 point. Primary outcome was sICH by European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II criteria. Secondary outcome was unfavorable outcome at discharge defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 3 or more.

RESULTS

Of 1659 patients with acute ischemic stroke, thrombolysis was performed in 657 patients. Complete primary outcome and imaging data were available for 432 patients (median age, 75; interquartile range [IQR], 12 years; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 12 [IQR, 11]; 52.8% women). Nineteen patients (4.4%) had sICH, and 259 patients (60.0%) had an unfavorable outcome at discharge. Interobserver agreement between ASPECTS assessment was fair (κ = .51). ASPECTS underestimation was neither associated with sICH (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), .36-4.83, P = .68) nor unfavorable outcome (adjusted OR, 1.10; 95% CI, .47-2.54; P = .83).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite fair interrater agreement between stroke neurologists and expert neuroradiologists, underestimation of ASPECTS by the former was not associated with thrombolysis-related sICH in our telestroke network.