Brännström K Jonas, Holm Lucas, Lyberg-Åhlander Viveka, Haake Magnus, Kastberg Tobias, Sahlén Birgitta
Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Linneaus' environment: Cognition, Communication and Learning, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Linneaus' environment: Cognition, Communication and Learning, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
J Voice. 2015 Sep;29(5):624-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
Previous studies suggest that dysphonic voices are perceived more negatively than typical voices, and it is possible that vocal perception influences academic achievement and comprehension. This study assessed children's subjective ratings and opinions of a typical and dysphonic voice after performing a language comprehension task in background noise. It also explored if subjective ratings were related to performance in the comprehension task.
Ninety-three 8-year-old children participated and were randomly allocated to two groups.
A digital version of the Test for Reception of Grammar, version 2 (TROG-2) was used. In TROG-2, the child listens to a sentence and then, out of four possible pictures, selects the picture that corresponds to the sentence content. Each sentence assesses a specific grammatical construction. Test instructions were recorded using one speaker with two different voice qualities (typical voice and provoked dysphonic voice). One group of children performed TROG-2 with the typical voice and the other with the dysphonic voice, both presented in a multitalker babble noise using earphones. All children rated their subjective perception of the voice.
The dysphonic voice received poorer ratings than the typical voice. Children making more positive ratings of the voice performed better on earlier blocks in TROG-2, but only in the typical voice group.
Children perceived the dysphonic voice more negatively even when listening to the same speaker. Performance is related to the perception of the voice, but only when the perceptual load of the task-relevant stimuli is sufficiently low.
以往研究表明,与正常嗓音相比,嗓音障碍患者的声音更易被负面评价,且嗓音感知可能会影响学业成绩和理解能力。本研究评估了儿童在背景噪音中完成语言理解任务后,对正常嗓音和嗓音障碍患者声音的主观评分及看法。同时还探讨了主观评分是否与理解任务的表现相关。
93名8岁儿童参与研究,并被随机分为两组。
采用数字版语法接受测试第二版(TROG - 2)。在TROG - 2测试中,儿童听一个句子,然后从四张可能的图片中选择与句子内容相符的图片。每个句子评估一种特定的语法结构。测试说明由一名具有两种不同嗓音特质(正常嗓音和诱发的嗓音障碍患者声音)的说话者录制。一组儿童在听正常嗓音时完成TROG - 2测试,另一组在听嗓音障碍患者声音时完成测试,均通过耳机以多人嘈杂声呈现。所有儿童对声音的主观感受进行评分。
嗓音障碍患者的声音评分低于正常嗓音。对声音给予更积极评分的儿童在TROG - 2测试的较早部分表现更好,但仅在正常嗓音组中如此。
即使听的是同一名说话者,儿童对嗓音障碍患者声音的负面感受更强。表现与声音感知相关,但仅在与任务相关刺激的感知负荷足够低时如此。