Suppr超能文献

接受根治性前列腺切除术或放射治疗的局限性前列腺癌男性患者的临床和生化结局。

Clinical and biochemical outcomes of men undergoing radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.

作者信息

Schreiber David, Rineer Justin, Weiss Jeffrey P, Safdieh Joseph, Weiner Joseph, Rotman Marvin, Schwartz David

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA. ; SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

University of Florida Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol J. 2015 Mar;33(1):21-8. doi: 10.3857/roj.2015.33.1.21. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We analyzed outcomes of patients with prostate cancer undergoing either radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) +/- salvage radiation or definitive radiation therapy (RT) +/- androgen deprivation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2003-2010 there were 251 patients who underwent RRP and 469 patients who received RT (≥7,560 cGy) for prostate cancer. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed with the log-rank test to compare biochemical control (bCR), distant metastatic-free survival (DMPFS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) between the two groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 70 months and 61.3% of the men were African American. For low risk disease the 6-year bCR were 90.3% for RT and 85.6% for RRP (p = 0.23) and the 6-year post-salvage bCR were 90.3% vs. 90.9%, respectively (p = 0.84). For intermediate risk disease the 6-year bCR were 82.6% for RT and 59.7% for RRP (p < 0.001) and 82.6% vs. 74.0%, respectively, after including those salvaged with RT (p = 0.06). For high risk disease, the 6-year bCR were 67.4% for RT and 41.3% for RRP (p < 0.001) and after including those salvaged with RT was 67.4% vs. 43.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to DMPFS or PCSS.

CONCLUSION

Treatment approaches utilizing RRP +/- salvage radiation or RT +/- androgen deprivation yielded equivalent DMPFS and PCSS outcomes. Biochemical control rates, using their respective definitions, appeared equivalent or better in those who received treatment with RT.

摘要

目的

我们分析了接受根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RRP)±挽救性放疗或确定性放疗(RT)±雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌患者的治疗结果。

材料与方法

2003年至2010年期间,有251例患者接受了RRP治疗,469例患者接受了前列腺癌的RT治疗(≥7560 cGy)。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和对数秩检验比较两组之间的生化控制(bCR)、无远处转移生存期(DMPFS)和前列腺癌特异性生存期(PCSS)。

结果

中位随访时间为70个月,61.3%的男性为非裔美国人。对于低风险疾病,RT组的6年bCR为90.3%,RRP组为85.6%(p = 0.23),挽救性治疗后的6年bCR分别为90.3%和90.9%(p = 0.84)。对于中风险疾病,RT组的6年bCR为82.6%,RRP组为59.7%(p < 0.001),纳入接受RT挽救性治疗的患者后分别为82.6%和74.0%(p = 0.06)。对于高风险疾病,RT组的6年bCR为67.4%,RRP组为41.3%(p < 0.001),纳入接受RT挽救性治疗的患者后分别为67.4%和43.1%(p < 0.001)。然而,两组在DMPFS或PCSS方面无显著差异。

结论

采用RRP±挽救性放疗或RT±雄激素剥夺的治疗方法产生了相当的DMPFS和PCSS结果。按照各自的定义,接受RT治疗的患者的生化控制率似乎相当或更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da55/4394065/eb4eecab020c/roj-33-21-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验