Zacny J P, Woolverton W L
Department of Psychiatry, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL 60637.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989 Jul;33(3):527-31. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90381-x.
Pigeons were trained to discriminate either d-amphetamine (1.7 mg/kg, IM) or pentobarbital (10 mg/kg, IM) from saline in a two-key, food-reinforced drug discrimination paradigm. Cocaine, procaine, and lidocaine were administered before test sessions to determine if these local anesthetics shared discriminative stimulus (DS) properties with either training drug. Cocaine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg) substituted for d-amphetamine in all 4 birds from the d-amphetamine-trained group. Procaine (3.0-56 mg/kg) substituted in 3 of the 4 birds from this group, and lidocaine (3.0-30 mg/kg) did not substitute in any bird. In contrast, cocaine, procaine, and lidocaine did not substitute for pentobarbital in any bird in the pentobarbital-trained group. These results suggest that the DS properties of some local anesthetics may be similar to those of psychomotor stimulants. Further, although some local anesthetics may have sedative-like actions, apparently these are not the basis of their DS effects.
在双按键、食物强化的药物辨别范式中,训练鸽子区分生理盐水与右旋苯丙胺(1.7毫克/千克,肌肉注射)或戊巴比妥(10毫克/千克,肌肉注射)。在测试环节前给予可卡因、普鲁卡因和利多卡因,以确定这些局部麻醉药是否与两种训练药物具有共同的辨别刺激(DS)特性。可卡因(0.1 - 3.0毫克/千克)在所有4只来自右旋苯丙胺训练组的鸟类中替代了右旋苯丙胺。普鲁卡因(3.0 - 56毫克/千克)在该组4只鸟中的3只中替代了右旋苯丙胺,而利多卡因(3.0 - 30毫克/千克)在任何鸟类中都未产生替代作用。相比之下,在戊巴比妥训练组的任何鸟类中,可卡因、普鲁卡因和利多卡因都不能替代戊巴比妥。这些结果表明,一些局部麻醉药的DS特性可能与精神运动兴奋剂的特性相似。此外,尽管一些局部麻醉药可能具有类似镇静的作用,但显然这些并非其DS效应的基础。