Suppr超能文献

[基于证据制定中医特色针灸系统评价/Meta分析报告指南:方法学探讨]

[Based on evidence to establish reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews/Meta-analysis: a methodology discussion].

作者信息

Wang Ya-Jun, Liu Ya-Li, Yang Ke-Hu, Guo Yi

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2014 Dec;34(12):1231-4.

Abstract

Existing reporting guidelines for systematic reviews/Meta-analysis (SRs/MAs) cannot meet the requirements of clinical practice and scientific research, so based on evidence, methods and thoughts on establishing reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews/Meta-analysis were proposed. Through literature analysis, according to evidence-based principle, preliminary ideas on methodology of establishing reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews /Meta-analysis were proposed. With consensus as one main research method, it was proposed that in the consensus that was selected and established by experts, the pro- portion of Chinese scholars should be increased to fully declare the opinions of Chinese acupuncturists, and by verification of practice and application, the reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews/Meta-analysis can be finally made.

摘要

现有的系统评价/ Meta分析(SRs/MAs)报告指南无法满足临床实践和科研的需求,因此基于证据,提出了建立具有中医特色的针灸系统评价/ Meta分析报告指南的方法和思路。通过文献分析,依据循证原则,提出了建立具有中医特色的针灸系统评价/ Meta分析报告指南方法学的初步构想。以共识法作为主要研究方法,提出在专家遴选确立的共识中,应增加中国学者的比例,充分彰显中国针灸人的意见,并通过实践应用验证,最终形成具有中医特色的针灸系统评价/ Meta分析报告指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验