Wang Ya-Jun, Liu Ya-Li, Yang Ke-Hu, Guo Yi
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2014 Dec;34(12):1231-4.
Existing reporting guidelines for systematic reviews/Meta-analysis (SRs/MAs) cannot meet the requirements of clinical practice and scientific research, so based on evidence, methods and thoughts on establishing reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews/Meta-analysis were proposed. Through literature analysis, according to evidence-based principle, preliminary ideas on methodology of establishing reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews /Meta-analysis were proposed. With consensus as one main research method, it was proposed that in the consensus that was selected and established by experts, the pro- portion of Chinese scholars should be increased to fully declare the opinions of Chinese acupuncturists, and by verification of practice and application, the reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews/Meta-analysis can be finally made.
现有的系统评价/ Meta分析（SRs/MAs）报告指南无法满足临床实践和科研的需求，因此基于证据，提出了建立具有中医特色的针灸系统评价/ Meta分析报告指南的方法和思路。通过文献分析，依据循证原则，提出了建立具有中医特色的针灸系统评价/ Meta分析报告指南方法学的初步构想。以共识法作为主要研究方法，提出在专家遴选确立的共识中，应增加中国学者的比例，充分彰显中国针灸人的意见，并通过实践应用验证，最终形成具有中医特色的针灸系统评价/ Meta分析报告指南。
