Dong Ying, Hou Haifeng, Wang Chunyan, Li Jing, Yao Qiong, Amer Said, Tian Mei
Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China ; Zhejiang University Medical PET Center, Hangzhou 310009, China ; Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China ; Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Imaging of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310009, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:489021. doi: 10.1155/2015/489021. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
After initial treatment of breast cancer (BC), monitoring locoregional recurrence and distant metastases is a great clinical challenge.
To evaluate the efficacy of PET/CT in association with serum tumor makers in BC follow-up.
Twenty-six women with a history of modified radical mastectomy were evaluated by 18F-FDG PET/CT. The results of PET/CT were compared with those of conventional imaging techniques (CITs) (including mammography, chest radiography, CT, MRI, ultrasound, and bone scintigraphy). Serum tumor markers of CEA, CA 125, and CA 15-3 in the BC patients were also analyzed in association with the results of PET/CT.
Compared with CITs, PET/CT was more sensitive to detect the malignant foci and had better patient-based sensitivity and specificity. The mean CA 15-3 serum level was significantly higher in the confirmed positive patients of PET/CT results than in the confirmed negative ones, while there were no significant differences in the serum levels of CEA and CA 125 of both groups.
PET/CT is a highly efficient tool for BC follow-up compared with CITs. The high serum levels of CA 15-3 in confirmed positive PET/CT patients indicated the clinical value of CA 15-3 in BC follow-up.
乳腺癌(BC)初始治疗后,监测局部区域复发和远处转移是一项重大的临床挑战。
评估PET/CT联合血清肿瘤标志物在BC随访中的疗效。
对26例接受改良根治性乳房切除术的女性患者进行18F-FDG PET/CT检查。将PET/CT的结果与传统成像技术(CITs)(包括乳腺X线摄影、胸部X线摄影、CT、MRI、超声和骨闪烁显像)的结果进行比较。还结合PET/CT的结果分析了BC患者的血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CA 125和CA 15-3。
与CITs相比,PET/CT对检测恶性病灶更敏感,基于患者的敏感性和特异性更好。PET/CT结果确诊为阳性的患者血清CA 15-3平均水平显著高于确诊为阴性的患者,而两组CEA和CA 125的血清水平无显著差异。
与CITs相比,PET/CT是BC随访的高效工具。PET/CT确诊为阳性的患者血清CA 15-3水平较高,表明CA 15-3在BC随访中的临床价值。