Suppr超能文献

保险状况与非复杂性急性鼻-鼻窦炎患者门诊医疗质量。

Insurance status and quality of outpatient care for uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts2Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio4Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio5Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Su.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jun;141(6):505-11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.0530.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Previous work suggests an association between insurance status and location of presentation (emergency department vs outpatient clinic) for evaluation of uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis (ARS).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the quality of outpatient care for ARS likewise differs based on insurance status.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of 13 680 145 pediatric and adult patients from the 2009 and 2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey diagnosed with uncomplicated ARS at an outpatient care facility.

EXPOSURES

Health insurance status.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were continuity of care with the patients' primary care physician (PCP) and time spent with a physician, which were chosen as proxies for quality of care. We evaluated associations between insurance status and these quality measures while controlling for clinical, demographic and socioeconomic patient characteristics, and outpatient practice setting.

RESULTS

Most patients (76.4%) had private insurance vs Medicare (12.3%), Medicaid (8.6%), or self-pay (2.8%). There was no association between insurance status and presentation of patients to their PCP. Physicians spent more time with Medicaid patients compared with patients with private insurance (β = 4.59; P = .01), independent of other factors. Provision of health education (β = 4.42; P < .001), necessity of a follow-up visit (β = 3.20; P = .002), and increasing patient age (β = 0.07; P = .01) were associated with longer visits. In multivariate analysis, living in a medium or small metropolitan area was associated with higher likelihood of being seen by one's own PCP than living in a large metropolitan area (odds ratio, 6.37; 95% CI, 2.13-19.05; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study did not identify any quality of care issues with respect to insurance coverage and primary care encounters for patients with ARS. In contrast to expectations, patients with Medicaid had longer outpatient physician visits and were equally likely to see their own PCP compared with patients with private insurance or Medicare.

摘要

重要性

先前的研究表明,保险状况与急性单纯性鼻窦炎(ARS)评估的就诊地点(急诊室与门诊诊所)之间存在关联。

目的

研究 ARS 门诊治疗的质量是否同样因保险状况而异。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项横断面研究,共纳入了来自 2009 年和 2010 年全国门诊医疗调查的 13680145 名儿科和成年患者,这些患者在门诊就诊时被诊断为急性单纯性鼻窦炎。

暴露因素

健康保险状况。

主要结局和测量指标

连续性护理和医生的诊疗时间是选择的护理质量替代指标,主要结局是初级保健医生(PCP)的连续性护理和医生的诊疗时间。我们在控制了临床、人口统计学和社会经济患者特征以及门诊实践环境的情况下,评估了保险状况与这些质量指标之间的关联。

结果

大多数患者(76.4%)拥有私人保险,而不是医疗保险(12.3%)、医疗补助(8.6%)或自费(2.8%)。患者就诊于 PCP 与保险状况无关。与私人保险患者相比, Medicaid 患者的就诊时间更长(β=4.59;P=.01),独立于其他因素。提供健康教育(β=4.42;P<0.001)、需要复诊(β=3.20;P=.002)和患者年龄增加(β=0.07;P=.01)与就诊时间延长有关。在多变量分析中,与居住在大型城市相比,居住在中或小的大都市地区与更有可能由自己的 PCP 就诊有关(比值比,6.37;95%置信区间,2.13-19.05;P=.001)。

结论和相关性

这项研究没有发现任何与 ARS 患者保险覆盖和初级保健就诊相关的医疗质量问题。与预期相反,与私人保险或医疗保险患者相比, Medicaid 患者的门诊就诊时间更长,与自己的 PCP 就诊的可能性相同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验