Hall Jennifer, Mansfield Louise, Kay Tess, McConnell Alison K
Division of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, England, UK.
Social Sciences and Health Theme, Brunel University London, London, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 15;15:152. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1506-y.
A lack of physical activity and excessive sitting can contribute to poor physical health and wellbeing. The high percentage of the UK adult population in employment, and the prolonged sitting associated with desk-based office-work, make these workplaces an appropriate setting for interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase physical activity. This pilot study aims to determine the effect of an office-based sit-stand workstation intervention, compared with usual desk use, on daily sitting, standing and physical activity, and to examine the factors that underlie sitting, standing and physical activity, within and outside, the workplace.
METHODS/DESIGN: A randomised control trial (RCT) comparing the effects of a sit-stand workstation only and a multi-component sit-stand workstation intervention, with usual desk-based working practice (no sit-stand workstation) will be conducted with office workers across two organisations, over a 12 month period (N = 30). The multicomponent intervention will comprise organisational, environmental and individual elements. Objective data will be collected at baseline, and after 2-weeks, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months of the intervention. Objective measures of sitting, standing, and physical activity will be made concurrently (ActivPAL3™ and ActiGraph (GT3X+)). Activity diaries, ethnographic participant observation, and interviews with participants and key organisational personnel will be used to elicit understanding of the influence of organisational culture on sitting, standing and physical activity behaviour in the workplace.
This study will be the first long-term sit-stand workstation intervention study utilising an RCT design, and incorporating a comprehensive process evaluation. The study will generate an understanding of the factors that encourage and restrict successful implementation of sit-stand workstation interventions, and will help inform future occupational wellbeing policy and practice. Other strengths include the objective measurement of physical activity during both work and non-work hours.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02172599, 22nd June 2014.
缺乏体育活动和久坐会导致身体健康状况不佳。英国成年就业人口比例较高,且与伏案办公相关的长时间久坐,使得这些工作场所成为减少久坐行为和增加体育活动干预措施的合适场所。这项试点研究旨在确定与常规使用办公桌相比,基于办公室的坐站两用工作站干预措施对日常坐姿、站姿和体育活动的影响,并研究工作场所内外影响坐姿、站姿和体育活动的因素。
方法/设计:将在两个组织的办公室工作人员中进行一项随机对照试验(RCT),比较仅使用坐站两用工作站和多成分坐站两用工作站干预措施与常规伏案工作方式(不使用坐站两用工作站)的效果,为期12个月(N = 30)。多成分干预将包括组织、环境和个人因素。在基线以及干预2周、3个月、6个月和12个月后收集客观数据。将同时进行坐姿、站姿和体育活动的客观测量(ActivPAL3™和ActiGraph(GT3X+))。活动日记、人种志参与观察以及对参与者和关键组织人员的访谈将用于了解组织文化对工作场所坐姿、站姿和体育活动行为的影响。
本研究将是第一项采用RCT设计并纳入全面过程评估的长期坐站两用工作站干预研究。该研究将有助于理解鼓励和限制坐站两用工作站干预措施成功实施的因素,并将为未来的职业健康政策和实践提供参考。其他优势包括对工作和非工作时间的体育活动进行客观测量。
Clinicaltrials.gov标识符NCT02172599,2014年6月22日。