• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用坐站式工作站减少上班族的久坐时间:一项随机交叉试验。

Using sit-stand workstations to decrease sedentary time in office workers: a randomized crossover trial.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jun 25;11(7):6653-65. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110706653.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph110706653
PMID:24968210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4113835/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine whether installation of sit-stand desks (SSDs) could lead to decreased sitting time during the workday among sedentary office workers.

METHODS

A randomized cross-over trial was conducted from January to April, 2012 at a business in Minneapolis. 28 (nine men, 26 full-time) sedentary office workers took part in a 4 week intervention period which included the use of SSDs to gradually replace 50% of sitting time with standing during the workday. Physical activity was the primary outcome. Mood, energy level, fatigue, appetite, dietary intake, and productivity were explored as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The intervention reduced sitting time at work by 21% (95% CI 18%-25%) and sedentary time by 4.8 min/work-hr (95% CI 4.1-5.4 min/work-hr). For a 40 h work-week, this translates into replacement of 8 h of sitting time with standing and sedentary time being reduced by 3.2 h. Activity level during non-work hours did not change. The intervention also increased overall sense of well-being, energy, decreased fatigue, had no impact on productivity, and reduced appetite and dietary intake. The workstations were popular with the participants.

CONCLUSION

The SSD intervention was successful in increasing work-time activity level, without changing activity level during non-work hours.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在久坐的办公室工作人员中,安装可调节高度办公桌(SSDs)是否可以减少工作日的久坐时间。

方法

2012 年 1 月至 4 月,在明尼阿波利斯的一家企业进行了一项随机交叉试验。28 名(9 名男性,26 名全职)久坐的办公室工作人员参加了为期 4 周的干预期,在此期间,他们使用 SSD 逐渐将工作日的 50%的坐姿时间替换为站立。身体活动是主要结果。情绪、能量水平、疲劳、食欲、饮食摄入和生产力被探索为次要结果。

结果

干预措施将工作时的久坐时间减少了 21%(95%CI 18%-25%),减少了 4.8 分钟/工作小时(95%CI 4.1-5.4 分钟/工作小时)。对于每周工作 40 小时,这相当于用站立代替 8 小时的坐姿,减少了 3.2 小时的久坐时间。非工作时间的活动水平没有变化。该干预措施还提高了整体幸福感、能量,降低了疲劳感,对生产力没有影响,并且降低了食欲和饮食摄入。参与者对工作站非常满意。

结论

SSDs 干预成功地增加了工作时间的活动水平,而不会改变非工作时间的活动水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b05f/4113835/f5142c969a9a/ijerph-11-06653-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b05f/4113835/2dac25383725/ijerph-11-06653-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b05f/4113835/aaf1649b7f29/ijerph-11-06653-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b05f/4113835/618272dbf3a5/ijerph-11-06653-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b05f/4113835/f5142c969a9a/ijerph-11-06653-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b05f/4113835/2dac25383725/ijerph-11-06653-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b05f/4113835/aaf1649b7f29/ijerph-11-06653-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b05f/4113835/618272dbf3a5/ijerph-11-06653-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b05f/4113835/f5142c969a9a/ijerph-11-06653-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Using sit-stand workstations to decrease sedentary time in office workers: a randomized crossover trial.使用坐站式工作站减少上班族的久坐时间:一项随机交叉试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jun 25;11(7):6653-65. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110706653.
2
The effectiveness of sit-stand workstations for changing office workers' sitting time: results from the Stand@Work randomized controlled trial pilot.坐站两用工作站对改变办公室职员久坐时间的有效性:“站立工作”随机对照试验试点的结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Oct 8;11:127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0127-7.
3
Stand-Capable Workstations Reduce Occupational Sedentary Time Among Administrative Workers.可站立式工作站可减少行政人员的职业久坐时间。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2024 Jul-Sep;12(3):162-174. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2024.2362720. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
4
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3.
5
The effectiveness of a 6-month intervention with sit-stand workstation in office workers: Results from the SUFHA cluster randomized controlled trial.一项为期 6 个月的使用坐站式工作站干预办公人员的效果:来自 SUFHA 群组随机对照试验的结果。
Work. 2024;79(2):879-890. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230624.
6
An intervention to reduce sitting and increase light-intensity physical activity at work: Design and rationale of the 'Stand & Move at Work' group randomized trial.一项旨在减少工作时久坐并增加轻度体力活动的干预措施:“工作时站立与活动”群组随机试验的设计与原理
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
7
Consistency of Sedentary Behavior Patterns among Office Workers with Long-Term Access to Sit-Stand Workstations.长期使用坐站式工作站的办公人员的久坐行为模式的一致性。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019 May 21;63(5):583-591. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxz022.
8
Impact of Sit-to-Stand and Treadmill Desks on Patterns of Daily Waking Physical Behaviors Among Overweight and Obese Seated Office Workers: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.坐姿与跑步机办公桌对超重和肥胖久坐办公人员日常清醒活动行为模式的影响:集群随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 16;25:e43018. doi: 10.2196/43018.
9
Long-term effects of sit-stand workstations on workplace sitting: A natural experiment.长期站立式工作位对工作场所久坐的影响:一项自然实验。
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Aug;21(8):811-816. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
10
Evaluation of ergonomic and education interventions to reduce occupational sitting in office-based university workers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估减少大学办公室工作人员职业久坐的人体工程学和教育干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Oct 12;14:330. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-330.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Lifestyle-related Determinants among Employees Working in the IT Sector of Pune City.评估浦那市信息技术行业员工中与生活方式相关的决定因素。
Indian J Community Med. 2025 Mar-Apr;50(2):379-384. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_653_23. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
Are there compensatory behaviors in response to a sit-stand desk intervention?是否存在针对坐站两用办公桌干预措施的代偿行为?
J Occup Health. 2024 Jan 4;66(1). doi: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae067.
3
The effectiveness of a 6-month intervention with sit-stand workstation in office workers: Results from the SUFHA cluster randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Sit-stand workstations: a pilot intervention to reduce office sitting time.坐立工作站:减少办公室久坐时间的初步干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.027.
2
Exercise for fitness does not decrease the muscular inactivity time during normal daily life.健身运动并不能减少人们日常生活中的肌肉静止时间。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Feb;24(1):211-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01456.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
3
Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses.打破长时间久坐可以降低餐后血糖和胰岛素反应。
一项为期 6 个月的使用坐站式工作站干预办公人员的效果:来自 SUFHA 群组随机对照试验的结果。
Work. 2024;79(2):879-890. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230624.
4
Effect of Active Workstations on Neurocognitive Performance and Typing Skills: A Randomized Clinical Trial.主动工作站对神经认知表现和打字技能的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 16;13(8):e031228. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031228. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
StandUPTV: Preparation and optimization phases of a mHealth intervention to reduce sedentary screen time in adults.站立式电视:减少成年人久坐屏幕时间的移动健康干预的准备和优化阶段。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Jan;136:107402. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107402. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
6
Supporting School Staff: Insights From Employee Health and Well-Being Programs.支持学校员工:员工健康和福利计划的启示。
J Sch Health. 2023 Sep;93(9):842-852. doi: 10.1111/josh.13377.
7
The effects of active workstations on reducing work-specific sedentary time in office workers: a network meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials.主动工作站对减少办公人员工作中特定久坐时间的影响:23 项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jul 27;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01467-5.
8
Physiology of sedentary behavior.久坐行为生理学。
Physiol Rev. 2023 Oct 1;103(4):2561-2622. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00022.2022. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
9
Longitudinal Effects of a sit-stand desk intervention - persistence, Fade-Out, and psychological momentum: a Randomized Controlled Trial.坐姿站立办公桌干预的纵向影响——坚持、消退和心理动力:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 2;10(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00948-9.
10
What works to reduce sedentary behavior in the office, and could these intervention components transfer to the home working environment?: A rapid review and transferability appraisal.哪些方法有助于减少办公室久坐行为,这些干预措施能否应用于家庭办公环境?一项快速综述与可转移性评估
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jul 29;4:954639. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.954639. eCollection 2022.
Diabetes Care. 2012 May;35(5):976-83. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1931. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
4
The Feasibility of Reducing and Measuring Sedentary Time among Overweight, Non-Exercising Office Workers.减少并测量超重且不运动的上班族久坐时间的可行性
J Obes. 2012;2012:282303. doi: 10.1155/2012/282303. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
5
Prolonged sitting: is it a distinct coronary heart disease risk factor?久坐:这是一个明确的冠心病危险因素吗?
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011 Sep;26(5):412-9. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3283496605.
6
Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire.职业久坐和身体活动问卷的有效性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1):118-25. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182251060.
7
The impact of stand-biased desks in classrooms on calorie expenditure in children.课堂中站立式课桌对儿童卡路里消耗的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):1433-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300072. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
8
Sedentary activity associated with metabolic syndrome independent of physical activity.与代谢综合征相关的久坐行为独立于体力活动。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):497-503. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0987.
9
Position statement on physical activity and exercise intensity terminology.关于身体活动和运动强度术语的立场声明。
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Sep;13(5):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
10
Comparisons of musculoskeletal complaints and data entry between a sitting and a sit-stand workstation paradigm.坐姿与坐立交替式工作站模式下肌肉骨骼不适情况及数据录入的比较。
Hum Factors. 2009 Jun;51(3):310-20. doi: 10.1177/0018720809338173.