Rossen Sine, Hansen-Nord Nete Sloth, Kayser Lars, Borre Michael, Borre Mette, Larsen Ryan Godsk, Trichopoulou Antonia, Boffetta Paolo, Tjønneland Anne, Hansen Rikke Dalgaard
Author Affiliations: Diet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen (DrsHansen, Tjønneland, and Rossen andMsHansen- Nord); Department of Clinical Medicine,Department ofUrology, AarhusUniversity Hospital, AarhusUniversity (Dr Michael Borre); Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital (MsMette Borre); SocialMedicine, Department of Public Health,University of Copenhagen (Dr Kayser); Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University (Dr Larsen); and Active Institute, Aarhus, Denmark (Dr Larsen); World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Nutrition, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Greece (Dr Trichopoulou); Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (Dr Boffetta).
Cancer Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;39(2):E1-9. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000259.
A prostate cancer diagnosis affects the patient and his spouse. Partners of cancer patients are often the first to respond to the demands related to their husband's illness and thus are likely to be the most supportive individuals available to the patients. It is therefore important to examine how spouses react and handle their husband's prostate cancer diagnosis.
The aim of this study was to explore how the prostate cancer diagnosis and the participation in their partners' behavioral lifestyle intervention program influenced the spouses' life, their relationship with their partner, and how they handle the situation.
Interviews were recorded with 8 spouses of potential low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance as part of a clinical self-management lifestyle trial.
We identified 3 phases that the spouses went through: feeling insecure about their situation, coping strategies to deal with these insecurities, and feeling reassured.
The framework of a clinical trial should include mobilizing spousal empowerment so that they can take on an active and meaningful role in relation to their husband's disease. The observations here substantiate that the framework of active surveillance in combination with a lifestyle intervention in 1 specific prostate cancer clinical trial can mobilize spousal empowerment.
Creating well-designed clinical patient programs that actively involve the spouse appears to promote empowerment (meaning, self-efficacy, positive impact, and self-determination) in spouses. Spousal participation in clinical patient programs can give spouses relief from anxieties while recognizing them as a vital support for their husband.
前列腺癌的诊断会影响患者及其配偶。癌症患者的伴侣往往是最先响应与丈夫疾病相关需求的人,因此很可能是患者可获得的最具支持性的人。所以,研究配偶如何应对和处理丈夫的前列腺癌诊断很重要。
本研究的目的是探讨前列腺癌诊断以及参与伴侣的行为生活方式干预项目如何影响配偶的生活、他们与伴侣的关系,以及他们如何应对这种情况。
作为一项临床自我管理生活方式试验的一部分,对8名接受主动监测的潜在低风险前列腺癌患者的配偶进行了访谈记录。
我们确定配偶经历了三个阶段:对自身处境感到不安全、应对这些不安全感的策略,以及感到安心。
临床试验的框架应包括调动配偶的赋权,以便他们能够在丈夫的疾病方面发挥积极且有意义的作用。此处的观察结果证实,在一项特定的前列腺癌临床试验中,主动监测框架与生活方式干预相结合可以调动配偶的赋权。
创建精心设计的、让配偶积极参与的临床患者项目似乎能促进配偶的赋权(意义、自我效能感、积极影响和自主决定)。配偶参与临床患者项目可以减轻配偶的焦虑,同时认识到他们是丈夫的重要支持力量。