Ko Celine M, Malcarne Vanessa L, Varni James W, Roesch Scott C, Banthia Rajni, Greenbergs Helen L, Sadler Georgia Robins
Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, 6363 Alvarado Court, Suite 103, San Diego, CA, 92120-4913, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2005 Jun;13(6):367-74. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0748-5. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
Prostate cancer, the most common life-threatening cancer among American men, increases risk of psychosocial distress and negatively impacts quality of life for both patients and their spouses. To date, most studies have examined the relationship between patient coping and distress; however, it is also likely that what the spouse does to cope, and ultimately how the spouse adjusts, will affect the patient's adjustment and quality of life. The present study examined the relationships of spouse problem-solving coping, distress levels and patient distress in the context of prostate cancer. The following mediational model was tested: Spouses' problem-solving coping will be significantly inversely related to patients' levels of distress, but this relationship will be mediated by spouses' distress levels.
One hundred seventy-one patients with prostate cancer and their spousal caregivers were assessed for mood; spouses were assessed for problem-solving coping skills. Structural equation modeling was used to test model fit.
The model tested was a good fit to the data. Dysfunctional spousal problem-solving was a significant predictor of spouse distress level but constructive problem-solving was not. Spouse distress was significantly related to patient distress. Spouse dysfunctional problem-solving predicted patient distress, but this relationship was mediated by spouse distress. The same mediational relationship did not hold true for constructive problem-solving.
Spouse distress mediates the relationship between spouse dysfunctional coping and patient distress. Problem-solving interventions and supportive care for spouses of men with prostate cancer may impact not only spouses but the patients as well.
前列腺癌是美国男性中最常见的危及生命的癌症,它会增加心理社会困扰的风险,并对患者及其配偶的生活质量产生负面影响。迄今为止,大多数研究都考察了患者应对方式与困扰之间的关系;然而,配偶的应对方式以及最终的适应情况也很可能会影响患者的适应情况和生活质量。本研究考察了在前列腺癌背景下配偶解决问题的应对方式、困扰水平与患者困扰之间的关系。对以下中介模型进行了检验:配偶解决问题的应对方式将与患者的困扰水平显著负相关,但这种关系将通过配偶的困扰水平来介导。
对171名前列腺癌患者及其配偶照顾者进行了情绪评估;对配偶的解决问题的应对技能进行了评估。采用结构方程模型来检验模型拟合度。
所检验的模型与数据拟合良好。配偶功能失调的解决问题方式是配偶困扰水平的显著预测因素,但建设性的解决问题方式则不是。配偶的困扰与患者的困扰显著相关。配偶功能失调的解决问题方式可预测患者的困扰,但这种关系是通过配偶的困扰来介导的。对于建设性的解决问题方式,同样的中介关系并不成立。
配偶的困扰介导了配偶功能失调的应对方式与患者困扰之间的关系。对前列腺癌男性患者的配偶进行解决问题的干预和支持性护理可能不仅会影响配偶,也会影响患者。