Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands,
Neth Heart J. 2015 Apr;23(4):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0669-6.
Defibrillator lead advisories stir a lot of emotions, both with patients and physicians, and this may influence lead management. We reviewed the literature for a more evidence-based approach to this issue.From the complications of two of the current advisory leads, the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis and St. Jude Riata leads, and the consequences of possible interventions, we can conclude that a restrained approach to premature replacement is appropriate. It may be opportune to replace the leads during a scheduled generator replacement in case of a higher electrical failure rate, in order to prevent future premature interventions.We found no support to extract non-functional advisory leads. In contrast, extraction is often more demanding than anticipated, and the risk substantially exceeds that of simply abandoning the leads.
除颤器导线警示引发了患者和医生的强烈情绪,这可能会影响导线管理。我们查阅了文献,以寻找更具循证医学方法来处理这个问题。从当前两种警示导线(美敦力 Sprint Fidelis 和圣犹达 Riata 导线)的并发症,以及可能干预的后果来看,我们可以得出结论,对过早更换采取克制的方法是恰当的。如果电故障发生率较高,在计划更换发电机时更换导线,以防止未来的过早干预,可能是合适的。我们没有发现支持取出非功能警示导线的依据。相反,取出导线通常比预期的要求更高,风险也大大超过了简单地放弃导线。