Hauser Robert G, Hayes David L
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55407, USA.
Heart Rhythm. 2009 May;6(5):605-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.024. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead is prone to fracture and was recalled in 2007 after 665 failures and five reported deaths. Approximately 150,000 patients at risk for sudden death in the United States have Sprint Fidelis leads. The rate of Sprint Fidelis lead failure may be increasing, and physicians are confronted with the decision to replace the lead prophylactically.
The purpose of this study was to determine if the hazard of Sprint Fidelis lead failure is changing and to compare its performance to other contemporary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads.
Transvenous ICD leads implanted and followed at our two tertiary-care referral centers between January 2004 and December 2008 were included in the study. Lead failure data were entered prospectively by both centers via the Multicenter Registry. Clinical data were collected prospectively by each center and merged for the purpose of this study.
During 5,700 implant years of follow-up (average 1.9 +/- 1.3 years), 94 of 3,037 defibrillator leads failed (1.65%/year), including 72 (8.5%) of 848 Sprint Fidelis leads. The cumulative hazard of Sprint Fidelis failure was significantly greater compared to 2,189 other defibrillator leads (P <.0001), and the hazard of Sprint Fidelis failure accelerated after the first year and continued to increase during the study. In contrast to other defibrillator leads, the Sprint Fidelis failure rate was significantly higher (3.75%/year vs 0.58%/year) and the 3-year estimated survival was significantly lower (87.9% [95% CI 84.8, 90.9] vs 98.5% [95% CI 97.8, 99.3]; P <.0001). The chance that a Sprint Fidelis lead would survive another year decreased progressively during the study. Most Sprint Fidelis failures were caused by pace-sense conductor fracture (n = 63 [87.5%]), which caused inappropriate shocks in 36 of 72 patients.
The hazard of Sprint Fidelis lead failure is increasing, whereas the failure rates of other defibrillator leads are low and stable. Physicians should consider these data when managing patients who have Sprint Fidelis leads.
美敦力Sprint Fidelis除颤器导线易于断裂,在出现665次故障并报告5例死亡后于2007年被召回。在美国,约有150,000名有猝死风险的患者植入了Sprint Fidelis导线。Sprint Fidelis导线的故障率可能在上升,医生面临着预防性更换导线的决策。
本研究的目的是确定Sprint Fidelis导线故障的风险是否正在变化,并将其性能与其他当代植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线进行比较。
纳入2004年1月至2008年12月在我们两个三级医疗转诊中心植入并随访的经静脉ICD导线。两个中心通过多中心注册前瞻性地录入导线故障数据。每个中心前瞻性地收集临床数据,并为该研究进行合并。
在5700个植入年的随访期间(平均1.9±1.3年),3037根除颤器导线中有94根发生故障(每年1.65%),其中848根Sprint Fidelis导线中有72根(8.5%)发生故障。与2189根其他除颤器导线相比,Sprint Fidelis导线故障的累积风险显著更高(P<.0001),且Sprint Fidelis导线故障的风险在第一年之后加速上升,并在研究期间持续增加。与其他除颤器导线相比,Sprint Fidelis导线的故障率显著更高(每年3.75%对每年0.58%),3年估计生存率显著更低(87.9%[95%CI 84.8,90.9]对98.5%[95%CI 97.8,99.3];P<.0001)。在研究期间,Sprint Fidelis导线再存活一年的几率逐渐降低。大多数Sprint Fidelis导线故障是由起搏感知导体断裂引起的(n = 63[87.5%]),在72例患者中有36例由此导致不适当的电击。
Sprint Fidelis导线故障的风险在增加,而其他除颤器导线的故障率较低且稳定。医生在管理有Sprint Fidelis导线的患者时应考虑这些数据。