Driedger S Michelle, Maier Ryan, Furgal Chris, Jardine Cindy
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, S113-750 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, Canada.
Indigenous Environment Studies Program, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 12;15:128. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1482-2.
During the first wave of the H1N1 influenza pandemic in 2009, Aboriginal populations in Canada experienced disproportionate rates of infection, particularly in the province of Manitoba. To protect those thought to be most at-risk, health authorities in Manitoba listed all Aboriginal people, including Metis, among those able to receive priority access to the novel vaccine when it first became available. Currently, no studies exist that have investigated the attitudes, influences, and vaccine behaviors among Aboriginal communities in Canada. This paper is the first to systematically connect vaccine behavior with the attitudes and beliefs that influenced Metis study participants' H1N1 vaccine decision-making.
Researchers held focus groups (n = 17) with Metis participants in urban, rural, and remote locations of Manitoba following the conclusion of the H1N1 pandemic. Participants were asked about their vaccination decisions and about the factors that influenced their decisions. Following data collection, responses were coded into the broad categories of a social-ecological model, nuanced by categories stemming from earlier research. Responses were then quantified to show the most influential factors in positively or negatively affecting the vaccine decision.
Media reporting, the influence of peer groups, and prioritization all had positive and negative influential effects on decision making. Whether vaccinated or not, the most negatively influential factors cited by participants were a lack of knowledge about the vaccine and the pandemic as well as concerns about vaccine safety. Risk of contracting H1N1 influenza was the biggest factor in positively influencing a vaccine decision, which in many cases trumped any co-existing negative influencers.
Metis experiences of colonialism in Canada deeply affected their perceptions of the vaccine and pandemic, a context that health systems need to take into account when planning response activities in the future. Participants felt under-informed about most aspects of the vaccine and the pandemic, and many vaccine related misconceptions and fears existed. Recommendations include leveraging doctor-patient interactions as a site for sharing vaccine-related knowledge, as well as targeted, culturally-appropriate, and empowering public information strategies to supply reliable vaccine and pandemic information to potentially at-risk Aboriginal populations.
在2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行的第一波期间,加拿大的原住民感染率过高,尤其是在曼尼托巴省。为了保护那些被认为风险最高的人群,曼尼托巴省的卫生当局将所有原住民,包括梅蒂斯人,列为在新型疫苗首次可用时能够优先接种的人群。目前,尚无研究调查加拿大原住民社区的态度、影响因素和疫苗接种行为。本文首次系统地将疫苗接种行为与影响梅蒂斯研究参与者甲型H1N1流感疫苗决策的态度和信念联系起来。
在甲型H1N1流感大流行结束后,研究人员在曼尼托巴省的城市、农村和偏远地区与梅蒂斯参与者进行了焦点小组访谈(n = 17)。参与者被问及他们的疫苗接种决定以及影响他们决定的因素。在收集数据后,回答被编码为社会生态模型的广泛类别,并根据早期研究的类别进行细化。然后对回答进行量化,以显示对疫苗决策产生积极或消极影响的最具影响力的因素。
媒体报道、同龄人群体的影响和优先排序对决策都有积极和消极的影响。无论是否接种疫苗,参与者提到的最具负面影响的因素是对疫苗和大流行缺乏了解以及对疫苗安全性的担忧。感染甲型H1N1流感的风险是积极影响疫苗决策的最大因素,在许多情况下,这一因素胜过任何同时存在的负面影响因素。
加拿大梅蒂斯人在殖民主义中的经历深刻影响了他们对疫苗和大流行的看法,卫生系统在未来规划应对活动时需要考虑这一背景。参与者感到对疫苗和大流行的大多数方面了解不足,并且存在许多与疫苗相关的误解和恐惧。建议包括利用医患互动作为分享疫苗相关知识的场所,以及有针对性的、适合文化背景的和赋权的公共信息策略,向潜在的高危原住民群体提供可靠的疫苗和大流行信息。