Suppr超能文献

在内镜模拟课程培训后,胃肠病学家与普通外科住院医师在结肠镜检查结果方面的等效性。

Equivalence in colonoscopy results between gastroenterologists and general surgery residents following an endoscopy simulation curriculum.

作者信息

Williams Matthew R, Crossett Joanna R, Cleveland Elaine M, Smoot Charles P, Aluka Kanayochukwu J, Coviello Lisa C, Davis Kurt G

机构信息

William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas.

William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2015 Jul-Aug;72(4):654-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2011, multiple gastroenterology societies published a position statement expressing concern over the American Board of Surgery guidelines regarding endoscopy education. Their position asserted that the American Board of Surgery's guidelines were inadequate to produce competency and the requirements should be similar to those adopted by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. This assertion failed to take into account the increasing use of simulation in surgical and endoscopic education.

METHODS

Surgery residents were required to complete a self-paced endoscopy simulation curriculum. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing colonoscopy at a single institution over a 6-month period was then undertaken. Specifically, the quality measures associated with colonoscopy including the cecal intubation rate and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared between those colonoscopies that were performed by faculty gastroenterologists and general surgery residents.

RESULTS

In total, 818 colonoscopies were performed during the study period-598 were performed by the gastroenterology service (GI) and 220 were performed by general surgery residents on the surgery service (GS). Baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. Cecal intubation rates for GI and GS were 98.4% and 93.5% respectively. ADRs were similar between the groups (GI-29.8% in men and 15.3% in women; GS-26.8% in men and 18.7% in women). GI was found to perform biopsies at a higher rate than GS: 0.92 vs 0.62 (not significant, NS). GS had a higher rate of adenomas biopsied: 0.42 vs 0.32 (NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Following endoscopy simulation training, general surgery residents, under the supervision of surgical staff, are capable of achieving quality measures equivalent to those of staff gastroenterologists at a single institution. The ADRs and cecal intubation rates seen in this study are consistent with those previously identified in the literature.

摘要

背景

2011年,多个胃肠病学学会发表了一份立场声明,对美国外科委员会关于内镜检查教育的指南表示担忧。他们的立场认为,美国外科委员会的指南不足以培养出胜任能力,其要求应与美国胃肠内镜学会所采用的要求相似。这一观点没有考虑到模拟技术在外科和内镜教育中的日益广泛应用。

方法

要求外科住院医师完成一个自主学习的内镜模拟课程。然后对某一机构在6个月期间接受结肠镜检查的所有患者进行回顾性研究。具体而言,比较了由胃肠病学教员和普通外科住院医师进行的结肠镜检查中与结肠镜检查相关的质量指标,包括盲肠插管率和腺瘤检出率(ADR)。

结果

在研究期间共进行了818例结肠镜检查,其中598例由胃肠病科(GI)进行,220例由普通外科住院医师在外科服务部(GS)进行。两组的基线特征相似。GI组和GS组的盲肠插管率分别为98.4%和93.5%。两组间的ADR相似(GI组男性为29.8%,女性为15.3%;GS组男性为26.8%,女性为18.7%)。发现GI组活检率高于GS组:0.92对0.62(无显著性差异,NS)。GS组腺瘤活检率较高:0.42对0.32(NS)。

结论

经过内镜模拟训练后,普通外科住院医师在外科工作人员的监督下,能够达到与单一机构中胃肠病学工作人员相当的质量指标。本研究中观察到的ADR和盲肠插管率与文献中先前确定的结果一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验