Faerber Adrienne E, Horvath Rebecca, Stillman Carey, O'Connell Melissa L, Hamilton Amy L, Newhall Karina A, Likosky Donald S, Goodney Philip P
The Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Mar 24;15:20. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0141-y.
Patients with no history of stroke but with stenosis of the carotid arteries can reduce the risk of future stroke with surgery or stenting. At present, a physicians' ability to recommend optimal treatments based on an individual's risk profile requires estimating the likelihood that a patient will have a poor peri-operative outcomes and the likelihood that the patient will survive long enough to gain benefit from the procedure. We describe the development of the CArotid Risk Assessment Tool (CARAT) into a 2-year mortality risk calculator within the electronic medical record, integrating the tool into the clinical workflow, training the clinical team to use the tool, and assessing the feasibility and acceptability of the tool in one clinic setting.
We modified an existing clinical flowsheet with the local electronic medical record for the CARAT risk model. To understand how CARAT would fit into the existing clinical workflow, we observed the clinic and talked with the clinical staff to develop a process map for the existing clinical workflow. CARAT was completed by the clinic nurse for patients identified on the clinic schedule as having carotid narrowing. We analyzed post-implementation assessment in two ways: quantifying the proportion of eligible patients with whom CARAT was utilized, and surveying surgeons to understand the impact of CARAT on decision-making and clinical workflow.
With minimum investment of institutional resources, we were able to produce a workable tool and pilot the tool in our clinic within a 6 month time period. Over 4 months, 287 patients were seen in the clinic with carotid narrowing, and clinic staff completed CARAT for 195 (68%). Per-surgeon completion rates ranged from 29 to 81%. Most patients (191 of 195, 98%) patients had a low 2-year calculated mortality risk. Most surgeons believed the risk assessment aligned with their expectations of patient predicted risk.
We successfully integrated CARAT into the existing electronic medical record and have preliminary evidence that CARAT can be a valuable tool for evaluating mortality risk for patients with diseased carotid arteries. Accuracy of the risk calculations must be evaluated in larger, multi-center studies.
无卒中病史但有颈动脉狭窄的患者可通过手术或支架置入术降低未来发生卒中的风险。目前,医生根据个体风险状况推荐最佳治疗方案的能力需要评估患者围手术期不良结局的可能性以及患者存活足够长时间以从手术中获益的可能性。我们描述了将颈动脉风险评估工具(CARAT)开发成电子病历中的2年死亡率风险计算器,将该工具整合到临床工作流程中,培训临床团队使用该工具,并在一个诊所环境中评估该工具的可行性和可接受性。
我们用本地电子病历为CARAT风险模型修改了现有的临床流程图。为了解CARAT如何融入现有的临床工作流程,我们观察了诊所并与临床工作人员交谈,以制定现有临床工作流程的流程图。诊所护士为诊所日程安排中确定为有颈动脉狭窄的患者完成CARAT评估。我们通过两种方式分析实施后的评估:量化使用CARAT的符合条件患者的比例,并调查外科医生以了解CARAT对决策和临床工作流程的影响。
在机构资源投入最少的情况下,我们能够在6个月的时间内制作出一个可行的工具并在我们的诊所进行试点。在4个多月的时间里,诊所共诊治了287例有颈动脉狭窄的患者,诊所工作人员为195例(68%)患者完成了CARAT评估。每位外科医生的完成率在29%至81%之间。大多数患者(195例中的191例,98%)的2年计算死亡率风险较低。大多数外科医生认为风险评估与他们对患者预测风险的预期相符。
我们成功地将CARAT整合到现有的电子病历中,并有初步证据表明CARAT可以成为评估颈动脉疾病患者死亡率风险的有价值工具。风险计算的准确性必须在更大规模的多中心研究中进行评估。