Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)转移患者非前哨淋巴结(non-SLN)转移的预测因素

Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in endometrial cancer.

作者信息

Touhami Omar, Trinh Xuan-Bich, Gregoire Jean, Sebastianelli Alexandra, Renaud Marie-Claude, Grondin Katherine, Plante Marie

机构信息

Gynecologic Oncology Division, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Pathology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jul;138(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the risk of metastasis in the remaining non-SLNs when the SLN is positive and to identify the factors that can predict this risk.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients who underwent primary surgery for endometrial carcinoma with lymphadenectomy and SLN mapping (November 2010-November 2013) in our center. SLNs were ultra-staged on final pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 268 patients were included. Overall, 43/268 patients (16%) were found to have SLN metastasis: macro-metastasis in 24 patients, micro-metastasis in 7 and ITC in 12. Non-SLN metastases were found in 15 of the 43 patients (34.8%) with positive SLN. Size of the SLN metastasis was the only factor associated with an increased likelihood of non-SLN metastasis (p=0.005). When the size of the SLN metastasis was ≤2mm, the risk of having another positive lymph node was only 5%, conversely, when the size of the SLN metastasis was >2mm, the risk of having another positive lymph node was 60.8% (p<0.0001). Histologic type, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, LVSI, cervical stromal invasion and CA-125 were not predictive.

CONCLUSION

When the SLN is positive, the risk of metastasis in the remaining non-SLNs was 34.8%. Size of the metastasis within the SLN was the only factor that could predict the risk of non-SLN metastasis; 2mm seems to be the cutoff size below which the risk of non-SLN metastasis is low.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定前哨淋巴结(SLN)阳性时其余非前哨淋巴结发生转移的风险,并识别可预测此风险的因素。

方法

我们回顾了2010年11月至2013年11月在本中心接受子宫内膜癌根治性手术并进行淋巴结清扫和SLN定位的所有患者。SLN在最终病理检查时进行超分期。

结果

共纳入268例患者。总体而言,268例患者中有43例(16%)发现有SLN转移:24例为宏观转移,7例为微观转移,12例为孤立肿瘤细胞(ITC)。在43例SLN阳性患者中,有15例(34.8%)发现非前哨淋巴结转移。SLN转移灶大小是与非前哨淋巴结转移可能性增加相关的唯一因素(p = 0.005)。当SLN转移灶大小≤2mm时,出现另一个阳性淋巴结的风险仅为5%,相反,当SLN转移灶大小>2mm时,出现另一个阳性淋巴结的风险为60.8%(p<0.0001)。组织学类型、分级、肌层浸润深度、淋巴血管间隙浸润(LVSI)、宫颈间质浸润和CA-125均无预测价值。

结论

当SLN阳性时,其余非前哨淋巴结发生转移的风险为34.8%。SLN内转移灶的大小是唯一可预测非前哨淋巴结转移风险的因素;2mm似乎是一个临界大小,低于此大小非前哨淋巴结转移风险较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验