Suppr超能文献

综合抗菌管理计划对死亡率的影响:一项队列研究。

Effects of a bundled Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on mortality: a cohort study.

作者信息

Okumura Lucas Miyake, Silva Monica Maria Gomes da, Veroneze Izelandia

机构信息

Hospital Pharmacy Department, Clinical Hospital, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

Infectious Disease Control Service, Clinical Hospital, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Infect Dis. 2015 May-Jun;19(3):246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess a bundled Antimicrobial Stewardship Program and its effect on mortality.

DATA

Eight months of clinical electronic medical records and Antimicrobial Stewardship Program registries were used as source of data.

METHOD

This is a historical cohort study conducted in a Brazilian University Hospital. Eligible patients were admitted to general wards or intensive care units and had an antimicrobial therapy prescribed and assessed by different strategies: Bundled Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (bundled intervention consisted of clinical pharmacist chart review, discussion with microbiologist and infectious disease physicians, local education and continuous follow-up) or Conventional Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (clinical pharmacist chart review and discussion with infectious disease physician). Primary outcome from this study was 30-day mortality, which was compared between groups, by using Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test. Other outcomes included Defined Daily Doses per 1000 patient-days and occurrence of resistant bacteria.

RESULTS

From 533 patients, 491 were eligible for the study, of which 191 patients were included to Antimicrobial Stewardship Program and 300 to Conventional strategy. In general, they were likely to be male and age was similar in groups (58.9 vs 55.5 years, p=0.38). Likewise, Charlson Comorbidity Index was not statistically different between groups (2.6 vs 2.7, p=0.2). Bloodstream site infections were frequently diagnosed in both groups (30.89% vs 26%, p=0.24). Other less common sites of infections were central nervous system and lungs. The ASP group had higher survival rates (p<0.01) and the risk difference was 10.8% (95% CI: 2.41-19.14). There were less Defined Daily Doses per 1000 patient-days (417 vs 557.2, p<0.05) and higher rates of resistant bacteria identified in the ASP group (83% vs 17%).

CONCLUSION

Bundled ASP was the most effective strategy, with reduced mortality and Defined Daily Doses per 1000 patient-days.

摘要

目的

评估综合抗菌药物管理计划及其对死亡率的影响。

数据

八个月的临床电子病历和抗菌药物管理计划登记册用作数据来源。

方法

这是一项在巴西大学医院进行的历史性队列研究。符合条件的患者入住普通病房或重症监护病房,并接受了不同策略开具和评估的抗菌治疗:综合抗菌药物管理计划(综合干预包括临床药师病历审查、与微生物学家和传染病医生讨论、当地教育和持续随访)或传统抗菌药物管理计划(临床药师病历审查和与传染病医生讨论)。本研究的主要结局是30天死亡率,通过使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和对数秩检验在组间进行比较。其他结局包括每1000患者日限定日剂量和耐药菌的发生情况。

结果

在533例患者中,491例符合研究条件,其中191例患者纳入抗菌药物管理计划,300例采用传统策略。总体而言,他们可能为男性,两组年龄相似(58.9岁对55.5岁,p = 0.38)。同样,Charlson合并症指数在两组之间无统计学差异(2.6对2.7,p = 0.2)。两组均频繁诊断出血流部位感染(30.89%对26%,p = 0.24)。其他不太常见的感染部位是中枢神经系统和肺部。抗菌药物管理计划组的生存率更高(p<0.01),风险差异为10.8%(95%CI:2.41-19.14)。抗菌药物管理计划组每1000患者日的限定日剂量更少(417对557.2,p<0.05),且鉴定出的耐药菌发生率更高(83%对17%)。

结论

综合抗菌药物管理计划是最有效的策略,可降低死亡率和每1000患者日的限定日剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验