Pascale Joanne, Boudreaux Michel, King Ryan
US Census Bureau, Suitland, MD.
Department of Health Service Administration, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51(1):240-61. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12312. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
To compare estimates of health coverage from the pre- and post- redesign of the Current Population Survey (CPS) Annual Social and Economic Supplement.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: The CPS 2013 Content Test.
A test of the old and new CPS in which the control panel was a subset of the CPS production cases interviewed by phone and the test panel was conducted in parallel (also by phone) with a sample that had already completed the final rotation of the CPS. Outcome variables tested include uninsured and coverage type by subgroup and calendar year versus point-in-time estimates.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Census Bureau telephone interviewers.
The odds of having coverage in the past calendar year were higher under the new than the old CPS. Within the new CPS, calendar year estimates of coverage were higher than and distinct from point-in-time estimates. There were few statistically significant differences in coverage across demographic subgroups.
The new method reduced presumed underreporting of past year coverage, and the integrated point-in-time/calendar-year series effectively generated distinct measures of each within the same questionnaire.
比较当前人口调查(CPS)年度社会经济补充调查重新设计前后的医保覆盖情况估计值。
数据来源/研究背景:2013年CPS内容测试。
对新旧CPS进行测试,其中控制面板是通过电话访谈的CPS生产案例的一个子集,测试面板与已完成CPS最后一轮调查的样本同时(也通过电话)进行。测试的结果变量包括未参保情况以及按亚组和历年划分的医保覆盖类型与时间点估计值。
数据收集/提取方法:人口普查局电话访问员。
在新CPS下,过去一个日历年有医保覆盖的几率高于旧CPS。在新CPS中,历年医保覆盖估计值高于时间点估计值且两者不同。不同人口亚组在医保覆盖方面几乎没有统计学上的显著差异。
新方法减少了过去一年医保覆盖情况可能存在的漏报,并且综合的时间点/历年序列有效地在同一份问卷中生成了两者各自不同的衡量指标。