Teixeira-Poit Stephanie M, Halpern Michael T, Kane Heather L, Frost A Corey, Keating Michael, Olmsted Murrey
a RTI International, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA.
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):138-46. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011652.
PHENOMENON: Previous studies have not explored factors associated with decisions among neurology residents to pursue subspecialty training within neurology. Understanding career choices among neurology residents, particularly decisions regarding subspecialty training, is critical, as neurologists with specialized knowledge can help meet the needs of patients with specific disease conditions. This study addresses the knowledge gap about subspecialty training decisions by examining factors associated with neurology residents' interest in pursuing subspecialty training and the types of subspecialty training neurology residents consider.
We surveyed a geographically stratified sample of neurology residents in U.S. training programs using a two-stage survey design. In Stage 1, we randomly sampled half of the accredited neurology residency programs stratified by U.S. census region; Stage 2 involved a survey of neurology residents within these programs.
The majority (approximately 81%) of residents expressed interest in subspecialty training. Resident demographic characteristics and educational debt did not influence interest in pursuing subspecialty training. Residents were more likely to express interest in subspecialty training when they participated in any neurology research (odds ratio [OR] = 2.39), 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.13, 5.07], p = .02, and indicated more interest in careers involving teaching (OR = 8.33), 95% CI [1.64, 42.19], p = .01. Considering the "medical content of subspecialty" as a more important factor approached but did not reach statistical significance (OR = 3.12), 95% CI [0.97, 10.06], p = .06. Insights: Participation in any neurology research and interest in careers involving teaching are associated with interest in subspecialty training among neurology residents. Further research is needed to determine whether exposure to research and teaching stimulates interest in subspecialty training and whether residents believe that subspecialty training is instrumental in pursuing an academic career.
现象:以往的研究尚未探讨与神经科住院医师决定在神经科进行亚专业培训相关的因素。了解神经科住院医师的职业选择,尤其是关于亚专业培训的决定至关重要,因为具有专业知识的神经科医生有助于满足特定疾病患者的需求。本研究通过考察与神经科住院医师对亚专业培训的兴趣相关的因素以及神经科住院医师考虑的亚专业培训类型,填补了关于亚专业培训决定方面的知识空白。
我们采用两阶段调查设计,对美国培训项目中按地理位置分层的神经科住院医师样本进行了调查。在第一阶段,我们按美国人口普查区域对一半经认可的神经科住院医师培训项目进行随机抽样;第二阶段涉及对这些项目中的神经科住院医师进行调查。
大多数(约81%)住院医师表示对亚专业培训感兴趣。住院医师的人口统计学特征和教育债务并未影响其对亚专业培训的兴趣。当住院医师参与任何神经科研究时(优势比[OR]=2.39),95%置信区间(CI)[1.13,5.07],p = 0.02,他们更有可能表示对亚专业培训感兴趣,并且当对涉及教学的职业表现出更大兴趣时(OR = 8.33),95%CI[1.64,42.19],p = 0.01。将“亚专业的医学内容”视为更重要因素接近但未达到统计学显著性(OR = 3.12),95%CI[0.97,10.06],p = 0.06。见解:参与任何神经科研究以及对涉及教学的职业的兴趣与神经科住院医师对亚专业培训的兴趣相关。需要进一步研究以确定接触研究和教学是否会激发对亚专业培训的兴趣,以及住院医师是否认为亚专业培训对从事学术职业有帮助。