• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村地区残疾人士相关健康专业人员留用情况的因素:离散选择实验问卷的编制

Factors affecting retention of allied health professionals working with people with disability in rural New South Wales, Australia: discrete choice experiment questionnaire development.

作者信息

Gallego Gisselle, Dew Angela, Bulkeley Kim, Veitch Craig, Lincoln Michelle, Bundy Anita, Brentnall Jennie

机构信息

Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Building 3, Campbelltown Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, New South Wales, 2751, Australia.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Cumberland Campus, East St, PO Box 175, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 1825, Australia.

出版信息

Hum Resour Health. 2015 Apr 21;13:22. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0013-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12960-015-0013-7
PMID:25895685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4414418/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This paper describes the development of a discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire to identify the factors (attributes) that allied health professionals (AHPs) working with people with disability identify as important to encouraging them to remain practising in rural areas.

METHODS

Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 97 purposively selected service providers working with people with disability in rural New South Wales, Australia. Focus groups and interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a modified grounded theory approach involving thematic analysis and constant comparison.

RESULTS

Six attributes that may influence AHPs working with people with disability in rural areas to continue to do so were inductively identified: travel arrangements, work flexibility, professional support, professional development, remuneration, and autonomy of practice. The qualitative research information was combined with a policy review to define these retention factors and ensure that they are amenable to policy changes.

CONCLUSION

The use of various qualitative research methods allowed the development of a policy-relevant DCE questionnaire that was grounded in the experience of the target population (AHPs).

摘要

目的

本文描述了一项离散选择实验(DCE)问卷的开发过程,以确定与残疾人合作的专职医疗人员(AHPs)认为对鼓励他们继续在农村地区执业至关重要的因素(属性)。

方法

对澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村地区97名经过有目的挑选的与残疾人合作的服务提供者进行了焦点小组讨论和半结构化访谈。焦点小组讨论和访谈进行了数字录音、转录,并采用一种经过改进的扎根理论方法进行分析,该方法包括主题分析和持续比较。

结果

归纳确定了六个可能影响农村地区与残疾人合作的专职医疗人员继续这样做的属性:旅行安排、工作灵活性、专业支持、专业发展、薪酬和执业自主权。定性研究信息与政策审查相结合,以界定这些留用因素,并确保它们适合政策变革。

结论

使用各种定性研究方法使得能够开发出一份与政策相关的DCE问卷,该问卷基于目标人群(专职医疗人员)的经验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9031/4414418/4ea883f5b85c/12960_2015_13_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9031/4414418/4ea883f5b85c/12960_2015_13_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9031/4414418/4ea883f5b85c/12960_2015_13_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors affecting retention of allied health professionals working with people with disability in rural New South Wales, Australia: discrete choice experiment questionnaire development.影响澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村地区残疾人士相关健康专业人员留用情况的因素:离散选择实验问卷的编制
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Apr 21;13:22. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0013-7.
2
Should I stay or should I go? Exploring the job preferences of allied health professionals working with people with disability in rural Australia.我该留下还是离开?探索澳大利亚农村地区与残疾人共事的专职医疗人员的工作偏好。
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Jun 30;13:53. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0047-x.
3
Retention of allied health professionals in rural New South Wales: a thematic analysis of focus group discussions.新南威尔士州农村地区留住辅助医疗专业人员:专题小组讨论的主题分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 22;12:175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-175.
4
An explanation of turnover intention among early-career nursing and allied health professionals working in rural and remote Australia - findings from a grounded theory study.澳大利亚农村和偏远地区初入职场的护理及相关健康专业人员离职意向的解释——基于扎根理论研究的结果
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Sep;18(3):4511. doi: 10.22605/RRH4511. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Issues affecting therapist workforce and service delivery in the disability sector in rural and remote New South Wales, Australia: perspectives of policy-makers, managers and senior therapists.影响澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村和偏远地区残疾部门治疗师劳动力及服务提供的问题:政策制定者、管理人员和高级治疗师的观点
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1903. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
6
Who are they and what do they do? Profile of allied health professionals working with people with disabilities in rural and remote New South Wales.他们是谁,他们从事什么工作?新南威尔士州农村和偏远地区为残疾人服务的专职医疗人员简介。
Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Aug;23(4):227-34. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12163. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
7
Integrating evidence into policy and sustainable disability services delivery in western New South Wales, Australia: the 'wobbly hub and double spokes' project.将证据纳入澳大利亚新南威尔士州西部地区的政策和可持续残疾服务提供中:“摇摆枢纽和双辐条”项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 21;12:70. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-70.
8
Recruitment and retention of rural allied health professionals in developmental disability services in New South Wales.
Aust J Rural Health. 2004 Feb;12(1):28-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2004.00546.x.
9
What role can the rural pipeline play in the recruitment and retention of rural allied health professionals?农村人才输送渠道在招聘和留住农村专职医疗人员方面能发挥什么作用?
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):3438. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
10
Retention of the rural allied health workforce in New South Wales: a comparison of public and private practitioners.新南威尔士州农村联合卫生人员的保留:公共和私人从业者的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jan 27;13:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental preferences for the procedural sedation of children in dentistry: a discrete choice experiment.家长对儿童牙科治疗中程序镇静的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Front Pediatr. 2023 Dec 5;11:1132413. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1132413. eCollection 2023.
2
Patient Preference for Antiepileptic Drugs Treatment in China: Evidence From the Discrete Choice Experiment.中国患者对抗癫痫药物治疗的偏好:来自离散选择实验的证据
Front Neurol. 2020 Dec 3;11:602481. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.602481. eCollection 2020.
3
Characteristics and determinants of community physiotherapy utilization and supply.

本文引用的文献

1
Parents' perspectives on centralized cleft services for children: the development of a DCE questionnaire.父母对儿童集中性腭裂服务的看法:一份离散选择实验问卷的编制
Oral Dis. 2013 Mar;19(2):185-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2012.01969.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
2
The influence of motivation in recruitment and retention of rural and remote allied health professionals: a literature review.动机对农村及偏远地区专职医疗人员招聘与留用的影响:一项文献综述
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1900. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
3
Retention of allied health professionals in rural New South Wales: a thematic analysis of focus group discussions.
社区物理治疗利用与供应的特征及决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 14;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3994-4.
4
The Best of Both Worlds: An Example Mixed Methods Approach to Understand Men's Preferences for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.两全其美:一种混合方法研究,旨在了解男性对下尿路症状治疗的偏好。
Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):55-67. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0263-7.
5
Should I stay or should I go? Exploring the job preferences of allied health professionals working with people with disability in rural Australia.我该留下还是离开?探索澳大利亚农村地区与残疾人共事的专职医疗人员的工作偏好。
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Jun 30;13:53. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0047-x.
新南威尔士州农村地区留住辅助医疗专业人员:专题小组讨论的主题分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 22;12:175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-175.
4
Issues affecting therapist workforce and service delivery in the disability sector in rural and remote New South Wales, Australia: perspectives of policy-makers, managers and senior therapists.影响澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村和偏远地区残疾部门治疗师劳动力及服务提供的问题:政策制定者、管理人员和高级治疗师的观点
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1903. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
5
Integrating evidence into policy and sustainable disability services delivery in western New South Wales, Australia: the 'wobbly hub and double spokes' project.将证据纳入澳大利亚新南威尔士州西部地区的政策和可持续残疾服务提供中:“摇摆枢纽和双辐条”项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 21;12:70. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-70.
6
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述。
Health Econ. 2012 Feb;21(2):145-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.1697. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
7
Understanding the 'four directions of travel': qualitative research into the factors affecting recruitment and retention of doctors in rural Vietnam.理解“四个方向的发展”:对影响越南农村医生招聘和留用因素的定性研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2011 Aug 17;9:20. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-9-20.
8
Physician shortages in rural Vietnam: using a labor market approach to inform policy.越南农村地区的医生短缺:利用劳动力市场方法为政策提供信息。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(7):970-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
9
Is health workforce sustainability in Australia and New Zealand a realistic policy goal?澳大利亚和新西兰的卫生人力可持续性是一个现实的政策目标吗?
Aust Health Rev. 2011 May;35(2):152-5. doi: 10.1071/AH10897.
10
Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations.运用定性方法进行离散选择实验的属性开发:问题与建议。
Health Econ. 2012 Jun;21(6):730-41. doi: 10.1002/hec.1739. Epub 2011 May 6.