Leighton B L, Gross J B
Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anesthesiology. 1989 Dec;71(6):848-51. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198912000-00007.
The authors conducted a two-part study to evaluate the efficacy of 1 ml of air as a "test dose" for detection of intravenously located epidural catheters. In part 1, a Doppler fetal heart rate monitoring probe was placed over the precordium of 33 laboring patients in whom functioning epidural catheters were in place. Each patient received, more than 90 s apart, in random order: 10 ml of agitated saline (containing less than 0.5 ml of air microbubbles) via a peripheral vein; 2 ml of air via the epidural catheter; and a sham injection (i.e., nothing injected). In all 33 cases, a blinded observer identified Doppler changes 10-30 s following the injection of air (microbubbles) via peripheral vein. Doppler changes were never heard following epidural air injection (P less than 0.001 compared with iv air microbubble injection) or the sham injection (P less than 0.001 compared with iv air microbubble injection). In part 2, the authors listened for Doppler heart tone changes while injecting 1 ml of air via catheters that were accidentally inserted in the epidural veins of five other patients. Unequivocal Doppler changes compatible with intracardiac air always occurred within 3 s, and no signs or symptoms of air embolism developed. The results suggest that 1 ml of air may be a suitable indicator of iv epidural catheter location.
作者进行了一项分为两部分的研究,以评估1毫升空气作为“试验剂量”用于检测静脉内位置的硬膜外导管的有效性。在第一部分中,将多普勒胎儿心率监测探头置于33例正在分娩且已置入功能正常硬膜外导管的患者的心前区。每位患者以随机顺序,间隔90秒以上接受以下操作:经外周静脉注入10毫升振荡生理盐水(含少于0.5毫升空气微泡);经硬膜外导管注入2毫升空气;以及假注射(即不注射任何东西)。在所有33例病例中,一名盲法观察者在经外周静脉注入空气(微泡)后10 - 30秒识别出多普勒变化。硬膜外注入空气后从未听到多普勒变化(与静脉注入空气微泡相比,P<0.001),假注射后也未听到(与静脉注入空气微泡相比,P<0.001)。在第二部分中,作者在经意外插入其他5例患者硬膜外静脉的导管注入1毫升空气时,监听多普勒心音变化。与心内空气相符的明确多普勒变化总是在3秒内出现,且未出现空气栓塞的体征或症状。结果表明,1毫升空气可能是静脉内硬膜外导管位置的合适指示物。