Suppr超能文献

共同决策在稳定型踝关节骨折保守治疗中的作用

The effects of shared decision making in the conservative management of stable ankle fractures.

作者信息

Hutchinson R H, Barrie J L

机构信息

Trauma & Orthopaedics Department, Blackburn Hospital, UK.

Trauma & Orthopaedics Department, Blackburn Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Injury. 2015;46(6):1116-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Jan 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The majority of ankle fractures seen in clinic are stable, will not displace and do not require plaster casting to achieve union in a good position. Nevertheless, many patients with stable ankle fractures are advised that they need a cast. In this study we counseled patients regarding the different options for conservative management of their stable ankle fracture. We then encouraged them to make an informed decision on which method of treatment they would like to pursue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed eight years of a single consultant's fracture clinic. 163 patients were offered a choice of: a weight bearing below knee cast; a functional ankle brace; or a regime of rest, ice, compression bandage and elevation ("RICE" regime). All patients were advised to mobilize on the injured ankle as their pain allowed.

RESULTS

163 patients were suitable for all 3 treatment options. 82% (133/163) chose an ankle brace, 15% (25/163) opted for a RICE regime and 3% (5/163) chose a below knee cast. Of these only one returned to clinic complaining of increased pain, however after further discussion the patient opted to continue with his RICE regime as planned.

DISCUSSION

A conservative approach to these injuries is now common practice; however there is a wide variation in what type of conservative management is given. Recent studies suggest orthopedic surgeons are still treating the majority of these injuries with a weight-bearing cast despite risks of stiffness, skin damage and thromboembolism. This study showed when the patient is given opportunity to make an informed choice the vast majority opt not to have a cast. The study suggests management of these injuries should be decided via a two-way conversation between patient and practitioner.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a shared decision making approach to these injuries is a useful method of providing patients with the most suitable treatment for their personal treatment goals.

摘要

引言

临床上所见的大多数踝关节骨折是稳定的,不会移位,无需石膏固定就能在良好位置实现愈合。然而,许多稳定型踝关节骨折患者却被告知需要打石膏。在本研究中,我们就稳定型踝关节骨折保守治疗的不同选择向患者提供咨询。然后鼓励他们就是否进行治疗以及选择何种治疗方法做出明智的决定。

材料与方法

我们分析了一位会诊医生八年的骨折门诊病例。163例患者可选择以下治疗方式:膝下负重石膏固定;功能性踝关节支具;或休息、冰敷、加压包扎和抬高患肢(“RICE”疗法)。所有患者均被告知在疼痛允许的情况下对受伤的踝关节进行活动。

结果

163例患者适合所有三种治疗方案。82%(133/163)的患者选择了踝关节支具,15%(25/163)的患者选择了RICE疗法,3%(5/163)的患者选择了膝下石膏固定。其中只有1例患者返回诊所,称疼痛加剧,但经进一步讨论,该患者选择按计划继续采用RICE疗法。

讨论

对这些损伤采取保守治疗方法目前已很常见;然而,在采用何种保守治疗方式上存在很大差异。最近的研究表明,尽管存在僵硬、皮肤损伤和血栓栓塞的风险,骨科医生仍在用负重石膏治疗这些损伤中的大多数。本研究表明,当患者有机会做出明智选择时,绝大多数人选择不打石膏。该研究表明,这些损伤的治疗应通过患者与医生之间的双向沟通来决定。

结论

对这些损伤采用共同决策的方法是为患者提供最适合其个人治疗目标的治疗方法的有效途径。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验