Abed Mona A, Khalil Amani A, Moser Debra K
Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Hashemite University, Zarqa, 13115, Jordan.
Associate Professor, Faculty of Nursing, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Res Nurs Health. 2015 Jun;38(3):213-21. doi: 10.1002/nur.21658. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
Qualitative investigators have suggested that symptom incongruence, or a mismatch between symptoms that patients expect and those they experience in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), increases the time to hospitalization by affecting emotional, cognitive, and behavioral factors. No quantitative studies have been conducted that verify these relationships. We aimed to (a) examine the relationships among symptom incongruence, prehospital delay, anxiety level at onset of symptoms, perceived seriousness and importance of symptoms, source to which symptoms were attributed, and patients' first response at symptom onset and (b) test the independent association of symptom incongruence to prehospital delay. Jordanian patients with AMI (n = 299) were interviewed using validated questionnaires, and medical records were reviewed to collect information on patients' prehospital delay time, symptom incongruence, and response to AMI symptoms. Patients had low mean (7.5 ± 3.6) symptom incongruence scores (range 0-21 out of 24) and relatively short median prehospital delay (1.3 hours). Symptom incongruence was positively correlated with and independently predicted prehospital delay. Greater anxiety and greater perceived seriousness and importance of symptoms were associated with less incongruence and shorter prehospital delay. Patients who attributed their symptoms to a cardiac etiology had significantly shorter prehospital delay and less symptom incongruence than their counterparts. Patients who contacted the emergency medical service directly after symptom onset had shorter prehospital delay than their counterparts who did not, but did not differ on the level of symptom incongruence. Symptom incongruence may increase prehospital delay by complicating patients' efforts to label and respond to AMI symptoms.
定性研究人员指出,症状不一致,即患者预期的症状与急性心肌梗死(AMI)实际经历的症状不匹配,会通过影响情绪、认知和行为因素而增加住院时间。目前尚未有定量研究证实这些关系。我们旨在:(a)研究症状不一致、院前延误、症状发作时的焦虑水平、对症状严重性和重要性的认知、症状归因来源以及症状发作时患者的第一反应之间的关系;(b)检验症状不一致与院前延误的独立关联。我们使用经过验证的问卷对299名约旦AMI患者进行了访谈,并查阅了医疗记录,以收集患者院前延误时间、症状不一致以及对AMI症状反应的信息。患者的症状不一致得分均值较低(7.5±3.6)(满分24分,范围为0 - 21分),院前延误中位数相对较短(1.3小时)。症状不一致与院前延误呈正相关且可独立预测院前延误。更高的焦虑水平以及对症状更高的严重性和重要性认知与更低的不一致性和更短的院前延误相关。将症状归因于心脏病因的患者比其他患者的院前延误显著更短,症状不一致也更少。症状发作后直接联系紧急医疗服务的患者比未联系的患者院前延误更短,但在症状不一致水平上没有差异。症状不一致可能会使患者对AMI症状进行识别和反应的过程变得复杂,从而增加院前延误。