Casaccia M, Bertello F, De Bernardi A, Sicuro M, Scacciatella P
Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Maggiore S. Giovanni Battista, Torino.
G Ital Cardiol. 1996 Jun;26(6):657-72.
Feasibility, safety and efficacy of prehospital management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and prehospital thrombolysis have been widely demonstrated. On this background, in March 1992 we started up an Emergency Medical Service (EMS)--Servizio per le Emergenze Cardiologiche Territoriali, SECT--aimed to prehospital care of overall cardiac emergencies (CE), including AMI. The Service, operating in the metropolitan area of Turin (130 Km2, 964,000 inhabitants), is based on a properly equipped ambulance, manned with a physician and a nurse, skilled in treatment of CE.
From March 1992 to December 1994, 5000 missions were performed, 2586 (51.7%) for chest pain, 1383 (53.5%) of presumed cardiac origin. Within the latter group, 426 (30.8%) cases of AMI, 109 (7.9%) cases of suspected AMI and 848 (61.3%) cases of angina were identified and treated. Decision time in AMI patients (pts) was 189.4 +/- 289.5 min (median 73), longer in pts over 70 years and in women. By means of a direct phone line between Emergency Communication System and metropolitan Coronary Care Units (CCU), 303/423 (71.6%) AMI pts, were directly admitted to CCU. Prehospital thrombolysis (PT) was performed in 211/426 pts (49.5%), with delay from symptom onset of 126.8 +/- 106.1 min (median 93). A rtPA "front loaded" regimen was used, with a full heparin and ASA as adjunctive therapy. Exclusion criteria for PT in 215 pts were: age > 75 years in 109 pts (50.7%), delay from symptom onset > 6 hrs in 55 (25.6%), ST depression in 33 (15.3%), contraindications to thrombolysis in 18 (8.4%). Eligibility to PT was 8.1% in chest pain pts and 43.5% in pts with AMI diagnosis at discharge. Another group of 38 pts underwent thrombolysis in hospital, after a review of inclusion criteria, with a longer delay of 231 +/- 184 min (median 150).
Out-of-hospital diagnosis was confirmed in 91% of both AMI pts and PT pts, and in 56.7% of suspected AMI pts. Overall complication rate was 32.1%, with similar rates in PT treated pts and not PT treated pts. Prehospital mortality rate was 0.7%. In-hospital mortality rate was 5.2% in PT pts with confirmed AMI, and 16.2% in not PT pts with confirmed AMI.
Our experience confirm efficacy of out-of-hospital management of AMI within an EMS designed to treat overall CE, considering successful treatment of complications and early thrombolysis with reduction of time delay. Inclusion of SECT in the growing up "118" Emergency Medical System raises logistic questions. Process will be completed when the "medical final authority" will submit each intervention to a full evaluation in terms of efficiency and efficacy, and will not only prepare, as now happens, dispatch and intervention protocols.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)的院前管理及院前溶栓的可行性、安全性和有效性已得到广泛证实。在此背景下,1992年3月我们启动了一项紧急医疗服务(EMS)——区域心脏病紧急情况服务(SECT),旨在对包括AMI在内的所有心脏急症(CE)进行院前护理。该服务在都灵市区(130平方公里,96.4万居民)开展,以一辆配备齐全的救护车为基础,车上配备一名医生和一名护士,他们均擅长治疗CE。
1992年3月至1994年12月期间,共执行了5000次任务,其中2586次(51.7%)是因胸痛,1383次(53.5%)推测为心脏原因。在后者中,确诊426例(30.8%)AMI、109例(7.9%)疑似AMI和848例(61.3%)心绞痛并进行了治疗。AMI患者的决策时间为189.4±289.5分钟(中位数73分钟),70岁以上患者和女性的决策时间更长。通过紧急通信系统与市区冠心病监护病房(CCU)之间的直拨电话线路,303/423例(71.6%)AMI患者被直接收入CCU。211/426例(49.5%)患者进行了院前溶栓(PT),症状发作后延迟时间为126.8±106.1分钟(中位数93分钟)。采用rtPA“先负荷剂量”方案,并使用全量肝素和阿司匹林作为辅助治疗。215例患者PT的排除标准为:109例(50.7%)年龄>75岁,55例(25.6%)症状发作后延迟>6小时,33例(15.3%)ST段压低,18例(8.4%)有溶栓禁忌症。胸痛患者中PT的适用率为8.1%,出院时诊断为AMI的患者中PT的适用率为43.5%。另一组38例患者在重新审查纳入标准后在医院进行了溶栓,延迟时间更长,为231±184分钟(中位数150分钟)。
91%的AMI患者和PT患者的院外诊断得到证实,疑似AMI患者的这一比例为56.7%。总体并发症发生率为32.1%,PT治疗患者和未进行PT治疗患者的发生率相似。院前死亡率为0.7%。确诊AMI的PT患者的院内死亡率为5.2%,确诊AMI的未进行PT治疗患者的院内死亡率为16.2%。
我们的经验证实了在旨在治疗所有CE的EMS中AMI院外管理的有效性,考虑到并发症的成功治疗以及早期溶栓并减少了时间延迟。将SECT纳入不断发展的“118”紧急医疗系统引发了后勤问题。当“医疗最终权威机构”对每项干预措施进行效率和效果方面的全面评估,而不仅仅是像现在这样制定调度和干预方案时,这一进程将完成。