Suppr超能文献

我们如何治疗原发性干燥综合征的全身性患者?对1120例患者的分析。

How are we treating our systemic patients with primary Sjögren syndrome? Analysis of 1120 patients.

作者信息

Gheitasi H, Kostov B, Solans R, Fraile G, Suárez-Cuervo C, Casanovas A, Rascón F J, Qanneta R, Pérez-Alvarez R, Ripoll M, Akasbi M, Pinilla B, Bosch J A, Nava-Mateos J, Díaz-López B, Morera-Morales M L, Retamozo S, Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zerón P

机构信息

Sjögren Syndrome Research Group (AGAUR), Laboratory of Autoimmune Diseases Josep Font, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Autoimmune Diseases, ICMiD, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.

Sjögren Syndrome Research Group (AGAUR), Laboratory of Autoimmune Diseases Josep Font, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Department of Autoimmune Diseases, ICMiD, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Primary Care Research Group, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Primary Care Centre Les Corts, CAPSE, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int Immunopharmacol. 2015 Aug;27(2):194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.03.027. Epub 2015 Apr 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe how systemic disease is treated in a large cohort of Spanish patients with primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) in daily practice, focusing on the adequacy of therapies for the level of systemic activity measured by ESSDAI score.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

By December 2014, our database included 1120 consecutive patients who fulfilled the 2002 classification criteria for SS. Therapeutic schedules were classified into 4 categories: no systemic therapies, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and/or low dose glucocorticoids (GCS) (<20mg/day), high dose GCS (>20mg/day) and use of second-line therapies (immunosuppressive agents, intravenous immunoglobulins [IVIG] and/or rituximab [RTX]).

RESULTS

There were 1048 (94%) women and 72 (6%) men , with a mean age at diagnosis of 54 years. The main drug-based therapeutic approaches for systemic pSS during follow-up were HCQ in 282 (25%) patients, GCS in 475 (42%, at doses >20mg/day in 255-23%), immunosuppressive agents in 148 (13%), IVIG in 25 (2%) and RTX in 35 (3%) patients. HCQ was associated with a lower risk of death (adjusted HR of 0.57, 95% 0.34-0.95). We classified 16 (7%) of the 255 patients treated with >20mg GCS and 21/148 (14%) treated with immunosuppressive agents as patients inadequately treated, mainly associated with articular involvement of low/moderate activity.

CONCLUSION

The management of pSS should be organ-specific, using low dose GCS in patients with moderate systemic activity, limiting the use of high dose GCS and second-line therapies to refractory or potentially severe scenarios. The use of systemic therapies for dryness, chronic pain or fatigue is not warranted.

摘要

目的

描述在日常临床实践中,一大群西班牙原发性干燥综合征(pSS)患者的系统性疾病是如何治疗的,重点关注根据欧洲抗风湿病联盟干燥综合征疾病活动指数(ESSDAI)评分衡量的系统性活动水平的治疗方法是否恰当。

患者与方法

截至2014年12月,我们的数据库纳入了1120例连续符合2002年干燥综合征分类标准的患者。治疗方案分为4类:未进行系统性治疗、使用羟氯喹(HCQ)和/或低剂量糖皮质激素(GCS)(<20mg/天)、高剂量GCS(>20mg/天)以及使用二线治疗(免疫抑制剂、静脉注射免疫球蛋白[IVIG]和/或利妥昔单抗[RTX])。

结果

共有1048名(94%)女性和72名(6%)男性,诊断时的平均年龄为54岁。随访期间,系统性pSS的主要药物治疗方法为:282例(25%)患者使用HCQ,475例(42%,其中255例[23%]使用剂量>20mg/天的GCS)使用GCS,148例(13%)使用免疫抑制剂,25例(2%)使用IVIG,35例(3%)使用RTX。HCQ与较低的死亡风险相关(校正风险比为0.57,95%置信区间为0.34 - 0.95)。我们将255例接受>20mg GCS治疗的患者中的16例(7%)和148例接受免疫抑制剂治疗的患者中的21例(14%)归类为治疗不充分,主要与低/中度活动的关节受累有关。

结论

pSS的管理应针对器官特异性,对于中度系统性活动的患者使用低剂量GCS,将高剂量GCS和二线治疗的使用限制在难治性或潜在严重的情况下。对于干燥、慢性疼痛或疲劳使用系统性治疗是不必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验