• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验室实践中质量观念的演变。临床实验室质量保证的历史概述。

Evolving concepts of quality in laboratory practice. A historical overview of quality assurance in clinical laboratories.

作者信息

Dorsey D B

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1989 Dec;113(12):1329-34.

PMID:2589944
Abstract

Early concepts of quality in clinical laboratory services stressed accuracy and precision. In the 1960s voluntary and mandated programs for laboratory accreditation followed. The increasing complexity of laboratory standard setting led to the promulgation of voluntary consensus standards in the 1970s. This was followed by a national reference system to minimize bias among clinical laboratories. The concept of total quality control emphasized that quality assurance must be a way of life for laboratorians, and concerns about growing laboratory volume led to the idea that managing laboratory utilization is also a component of quality assurance. Recent conferences have expanded the concept of laboratory quality to encompass everyone who participates, even remotely, in the provision of services. Now quality is evaluated by how well the patient is served.

摘要

临床检验服务中早期的质量概念强调准确性和精密度。20世纪60年代,出现了实验室认可的自愿性和强制性项目。实验室标准制定的日益复杂导致20世纪70年代发布了自愿性共识标准。随后建立了国家参考系统,以尽量减少临床实验室之间的偏差。全面质量控制的概念强调质量保证必须成为检验人员的一种生活方式,对实验室工作量不断增加的担忧导致了这样一种观点,即管理实验室的利用率也是质量保证的一个组成部分。最近的会议扩大了实验室质量的概念,将每个参与服务提供的人,即使是远程参与的人,都纳入其中。现在,质量是通过对患者服务的好坏来评估的。

相似文献

1
Evolving concepts of quality in laboratory practice. A historical overview of quality assurance in clinical laboratories.实验室实践中质量观念的演变。临床实验室质量保证的历史概述。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1989 Dec;113(12):1329-34.
2
[Good Laboratory Practice (GPL) and quality control in Dutch laboratories].[荷兰实验室的良好实验室规范(GPL)与质量控制]
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1991 Mar 15;116(6):286-95.
3
The external quality assessment schemes in Thailand.泰国的外部质量评估计划。
Rinsho Byori. 2002 Feb;50(2):121-5.
4
Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.实验室偏倚、精密度和总误差的多程序特征描述。关于利用共享外部和扩展内部(区域)质量控制样本池改进评估的建议。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):454-61.
5
[Quality improvement of medical diagnostic laboratories].[医学诊断实验室的质量改进]
Orv Hetil. 2003 Jul 13;144(28):1389-95.
6
The role of regional quality control programs in the practice of laboratory medicine in the United States.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Jul;66(1):268-75.
7
Quality assurance programs in the United States.
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1995;31(1):21-35.
8
External quality assessment scheme and laboratory accreditation in Indonesia.印度尼西亚的外部质量评估计划与实验室认可
Rinsho Byori. 2002 Feb;50(2):126-30.
9
Probability and the Westgard Rules.概率与韦斯特加德规则。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2003 Winter;33(1):113-4.
10
Overview of the laboratory accreditation programme of the College of American Pathologists.美国病理学家学会实验室认可计划概述。
East Mediterr Health J. 2002 Jul-Sep;8(4-5):654-63.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular pathology - the value of an integrative approach.分子病理学——综合方法的价值
Mol Oncol. 2014 Oct;8(7):1163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
2
Evolving approaches to management of quality in clinical microbiology.临床微生物学质量控制的不断发展的管理方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jan;7(1):55-88. doi: 10.1128/CMR.7.1.55.