Troyer Jennifer L, Jones Alan E, Shapiro Nathan I, Mitchell Alice M, Hewer Ian, Kline Jeffrey A
The Department of Economics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC.
The Department Emergency Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 May;22(5):525-35. doi: 10.1111/acem.12648. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
Quantitative pretest probability (qPTP) incorporated into a decision support tool with advice can reduce unnecessary diagnostic testing among patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and pulmonary embolism (PE), reducing 30-day costs without an increase in 90-day adverse outcomes. This study estimates long-term (beyond 90-day) costs and outcomes associated with qPTP. The authors hypothesized that qPTP reduces lifetime costs and improves outcomes in low-risk patients with symptoms suggestive of ACS and PE.
This was a cost-effectiveness analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of adult emergency patients with dyspnea and chest pain, in which a clinician encountering a low-risk patient with symptoms suggestive of ACS or PE conducted either the intervention (qPTP for ACS and PE with advice) or the sham (no qPTP and no advice). Effect of the intervention over a patient's lifetime was assessed using a Markov microsimulation model. Short-term costs and outcomes were from the trial; long-term outcomes and costs were from the literature. Outcomes included lifetime transition to PE, ACS, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH); mortality from cancer, ICH, PE, ACS, renal failure, and ischemic stroke; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs); and total medical costs compared between simulated intervention and sham groups.
Markov microsimulation for a 40-year-old patient receiving qPTP found lifetime cost savings of $497 for women and $528 for men, associated with small gains in QALYs (2 and 6 days, respectively) and lower rates of cancer mortality in both sexes, but a reduction in ICH only in males. Sensitivity analysis for patients aged 60 years predicted that qPTP would continue to save costs and also reduce mortality from both ICH and cancer. Use of qPTP significantly reduced the lifetime probability of PE diagnosis, with lower probability of death from PE in both sexes aged 40 to 60 years. However, use of qPTP reduced the rate of ACS diagnosis and death from ACS at age 40, but increased the death rate from ACS at age 60 for both sexes.
Widespread use of a combined qPTP for both ACS and PE has the potential to decrease costs by reducing diagnostic testing, while improving most long-term outcomes in emergency patients with chest pain and dyspnea.
将定量预检概率(qPTP)纳入带有建议的决策支持工具中,可减少疑似急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和肺栓塞(PE)症状患者的不必要诊断检测,降低30天成本且不增加90天不良结局。本研究估计了与qPTP相关的长期(超过90天)成本和结局。作者假设qPTP可降低疑似ACS和PE症状的低风险患者的终生成本并改善结局。
这是一项对成年急诊呼吸困难和胸痛患者进行的多中心随机对照试验的成本效益分析,其中临床医生遇到疑似ACS或PE的低风险患者时,实施干预措施(针对ACS和PE的qPTP并提供建议)或假干预措施(不进行qPTP且不提供建议)。使用马尔可夫微观模拟模型评估干预措施对患者终生的影响。短期成本和结局来自试验;长期结局和成本来自文献。结局包括终生转变为PE、ACS和颅内出血(ICH);癌症、ICH、PE、ACS、肾衰竭和缺血性中风导致的死亡;质量调整生命年(QALY);以及模拟干预组和假干预组之间的总医疗成本比较。
对接受qPTP的40岁患者进行的马尔可夫微观模拟发现,女性终生成本节省497美元,男性节省528美元,同时QALY有小幅增加(分别为2天和6天),且两性癌症死亡率降低,但仅男性的ICH发生率降低。对60岁患者的敏感性分析预测,qPTP将继续节省成本,并降低ICH和癌症的死亡率。使用qPTP显著降低了PE诊断的终生概率,40至60岁两性因PE死亡的概率也较低。然而,使用qPTP降低了40岁时ACS的诊断率和ACS死亡率,但60岁时两性因ACS的死亡率增加。
广泛使用针对ACS和PE的联合qPTP有可能通过减少诊断检测来降低成本,同时改善胸痛和呼吸困难急诊患者的大多数长期结局。