Suppr超能文献

ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者转至行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的全国性分析:美国心脏协会“使命:生命线”项目的研究结果

Nationwide Analysis of Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Transferred for Primary Percutaneous Intervention: Findings From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program.

作者信息

Dauerman Harold L, Bates Eric R, Kontos Michael C, Li Shuang, Garvey J Lee, Henry Timothy D, Manoukian Steven V, Roe Matthew T

机构信息

From the University of Vermont Cardiovascular Research Institute, Burlington (H.L.D.); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (E.R.B.); Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.C.K.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (S.L., M.T.R.); Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (J.L.G.); Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (T.D.H.); and Hospital Corporation of America, Nashville, TN (S.V.M.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002450.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend transfer and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients within the time limit of first contact to device ≤ 120 minutes. We determined the hospital-level, patient-level, and process characteristics of timely versus delayed primary PCI for a diverse national sample of transfer patients confined to a travel distance that facilitates the process.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 14,518 patients transferred from non-PCI-capable hospitals for primary PCI to 398 National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines hospitals between July 2008 and December 2012. Patients with estimated transfer times > 60 minutes (by Google Maps driving times) were excluded from the analysis. Patients achieving first door-to-device time ≤ 120 minutes were compared with patients with delayed treatment; independent predictors of timely treatment were determined using generalized estimating equations logistic regression models. The median estimated transfer distance was 26.5 miles. First door-to-device ≤ 120 minutes was achieved in 65% of patients (n = 9380); only 37% of the hospitals were high-performing hospitals (defined as risk-adjusted rate, ≥ 75% of transfer STEMI patients with ≤ 120-minute first door-to-device time). In addition to known predictors of delay (cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and prolonged door-in door-out time), STEMI referral hospitals' rural location and longer estimated transfer time were identified as predictors of delay. In this diverse national sample, regional and racial variations in care were observed. Finally, lower PCI hospital annual STEMI volume was a potent predictor of delay.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one third of US STEMI patients transferred for primary PCI fail to achieve first door-to-device time ≤ 120 minutes, despite estimated transfer times <60 minutes. Delays are related to process variables, comorbidities, and lower annual PCI hospital STEMI volumes.

摘要

背景

美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会当前指南建议,对于ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,应在首次接触至设备的时间限制≤120分钟内进行转运并实施直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。我们确定了一个全国性多样化样本中转运患者及时与延迟直接PCI的医院层面、患者层面及流程特征,该样本限于便于操作的行程距离。

方法与结果

我们研究了2008年7月至2012年12月期间从无PCI能力医院转运至398家国家心血管数据注册中心急性冠状动脉治疗与干预结果网络注册中心——遵循指南医院进行直接PCI的14518例患者。估计转运时间>60分钟(通过谷歌地图驾车时间)的患者被排除在分析之外。将首次门到设备时间≤120分钟的患者与延迟治疗的患者进行比较;使用广义估计方程逻辑回归模型确定及时治疗的独立预测因素。估计转运距离的中位数为26.5英里。65%的患者(n = 9380)实现了首次门到设备时间≤120分钟;只有37%的医院是高绩效医院(定义为风险调整率,即首次门到设备时间≤120分钟的转运STEMI患者比例≥75%)。除了已知的延迟预测因素(心源性休克、心脏骤停和较长的门进-门出时间)外,STEMI转诊医院的农村位置和较长的估计转运时间也被确定为延迟的预测因素。在这个全国性多样化样本中,观察到了护理方面的地区和种族差异。最后,PCI医院每年STEMI病例数较低是延迟的一个有力预测因素。

结论

尽管估计转运时间<60分钟,但超过三分之一因直接PCI而转运的美国STEMI患者未能实现首次门到设备时间≤120分钟。延迟与流程变量、合并症以及PCI医院每年较低的STEMI病例数有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验