• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤支付改革以实现真正的医疗改革。

Oncology payment reform to achieve real health care reform.

作者信息

McClellan Mark B, Thoumi Andrea I

机构信息

The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):223-30. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.004655. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.2015.004655
PMID:25901049
Abstract

Cancer care is transforming, moving toward increasingly personalized treatment with the potential to save and improve many more lives. Many oncologists and policymakers view current fee-for-service payments as an obstacle to providing more efficient, high-quality cancer care. However, payment reforms create new uncertainties for oncologists and may be challenging to implement. In this article, we illustrate how accountable care payment reforms that directly align payments with quality and cost measures are being implemented and the opportunities and challenges they present. These payment models provide more flexibility to oncologists and other providers to give patients the personalized care they need, along with more accountability for demonstrating quality improvements and overall cost or cost growth reductions. Such payment reforms increase the importance of person-level quality and cost measures as well as data analysis to improve measured performance. We describe key features of quality and cost measures needed to support accountable care payment reforms in oncology. Finally, we propose policy recommendations to move incrementally but fundamentally to payment systems that support higher-value care in oncology.

摘要

癌症护理正在发生变革,朝着日益个性化的治疗方向发展,有望挽救和改善更多生命。许多肿瘤学家和政策制定者认为,当前的按服务收费支付方式是提供更高效、高质量癌症护理的障碍。然而,支付改革给肿瘤学家带来了新的不确定性,实施起来可能具有挑战性。在本文中,我们阐述了直接将支付与质量和成本指标挂钩的责任医疗支付改革是如何实施的,以及它们带来的机遇和挑战。这些支付模式为肿瘤学家和其他医疗服务提供者提供了更大的灵活性,以便为患者提供所需的个性化护理,同时在证明质量改进以及总体成本或成本增长降低方面承担更多责任。此类支付改革增加了个人层面质量和成本指标以及数据分析对于改善所衡量绩效的重要性。我们描述了支持肿瘤学责任医疗支付改革所需的质量和成本指标的关键特征。最后,我们提出政策建议,以逐步但从根本上转向支持肿瘤学高价值护理的支付系统。

相似文献

1
Oncology payment reform to achieve real health care reform.肿瘤支付改革以实现真正的医疗改革。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):223-30. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.004655. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
2
Community oncology in an era of payment reform.支付改革时代的社区肿瘤学
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:e447-52. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e447.
3
Improving Oncology Quality Measurement in Accountable Care: Filling Gaps with Cross-Cutting Measures.提高责任医疗中的肿瘤学质量衡量标准:使用跨领域衡量标准填补空白。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Feb;23(2):174-181. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.2.174.
4
Commentary: health care payment reform and academic medicine: threat or opportunity?述评:医疗保健支付方式改革与学术医学:威胁还是机遇?
Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):756-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d0fdfb.
5
Paying more wisely: effects of payment reforms on evidence-based clinical decision-making.更明智地支付:支付改革对循证临床决策的影响。
J Comp Eff Res. 2013 May;2(3):249-59. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.27.
6
Payment reform. The lynchpin of health care reform.支付改革。医疗改革的关键。
Minn Med. 2011 Feb;94(2):33-7.
7
Emerging lessons from regional and state innovation in value-based payment reform: balancing collaboration and disruptive innovation.基于价值的支付改革中区域和州创新的新经验教训:平衡协作与颠覆性创新。
Milbank Q. 2014 Sep;92(3):568-623. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12078.
8
Achieving accountable care in Massachusetts: payment reform to drive delivery system change.在马萨诸塞州实现可问责医疗:推动医疗服务体系变革的支付改革。
Issue Brief (Mass Health Policy Forum). 2010 Nov 30(39):1-10.
9
The Economics of Provider Payment Reform: Are Accountable Care Organizations the Answer?医疗服务提供者支付改革的经济学: accountable care organizations 是答案吗? (注:Accountable Care Organizations 一般译为“ accountable care organizations”,可简称为“ accountable care organizations”,直译为“ accountable care organizations”,意译为“ accountable care organizations”,具体可根据上下文调整,这里暂保留英文未翻译)
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Aug;40(4):745-60. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3150038. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
10
Aligning payment reform and delivery innovation in emergency care.在急诊护理中协调支付改革与服务创新。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(8):515-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost Shifting in Lung Cancer Inpatient Care Under Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Reform: A Pilot Study in China.诊断-干预包改革下肺癌住院治疗中的成本转移:中国的一项试点研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Mar 5;18:759-773. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S498634. eCollection 2025.
2
The Impact of Biosimilar Use on Total Cost of Care and Provider Financial Performance in the Medicare Oncology Care Model: A Population-Based Simulation Study.生物类似药的使用对医疗保险肿瘤护理模式下的总护理成本和提供者财务绩效的影响:基于人群的模拟研究。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jan;41(1):349-363. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02703-x. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Reimbursement Matters: Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Accrual.
报销问题:克服临床试验入组障碍。
Med Care. 2021 May 1;59(5):461-466. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001509.
4
Resource Use and Medicare Costs During Lay Navigation for Geriatric Patients With Cancer.老年癌症患者接受非临床医生导航服务期间的资源利用和医疗保险费用。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;3(6):817-825. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6307.